Re: Preparing accounts with respect to DCA form.

Peter Saxton wrote:

On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:47:38 GMT, Ronald Raygun
<no.spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Peter Saxton wrote:

So when you said you'd issued 1 share and another time you said you'd
issued 1,000 shares isn't a change it's "a mistake"?

Indeed, if he said it. Perhaps I missed it, but I don't think he
actually did say that. Didn't he say there were 1000 authorised,
and he'd issued them all, and that he realised later that it would
have been better to have issued only one?

He saiid: "I asked the Inland Revenue for advice when I completed this
form but they werent very forthcoming, looking back I realise I should
have done
Issued share capital of 1 ordinary shares of £1 each, consideration
received by the company was £1"

Exactly. So he did *not* say he'd issued 1 share at all, did he?

It turns out that meant he should have only issued one share rather
than him meaning he should have entered that on the DCA form.

Well done, Sherlock, but isn't it obvious, given the context, that
that is the only thing it could have meant?

Please give us back the old Peter Saxton, who used to bend over backwards
to be helpful. Nowadays you just come across as bitter and twisted.
I blame Tim for this. :-)

Am I the new/young Peter Saxton or the very old Peter Saxton?

New as in relatively recently different from the one we know and love.
Old as in "of an age", but I wouldn't say "very old", not yet.
Nevertheless, the clock to retirement is ticking, and one might
wonder whether it's its sound that's making you fratchety.

I still try to help people but it is difficult to spend the time when
I have taken on so many new clients recently.

Ah, so you're overworked! That explains a lot. Having to tell new
clients (and especially potential new clients) what morons they are,
in the politest possible way, is bound to take its toll, and you end
up telling new posters here what morons they are in terms slightly
less than maximally polite.

I live in hope that
Digita release their Practice Management suite soon to make my life
easier.

You seriously think it will save you time?

I don't know how you find the time to spend giving such long
explanations.

Well, let's just say I'm not overworked with moronic clients.
The only morons I'm having to deal with at the moment are plumbers
who can't find the cause of a simple obvious fault.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Preparing accounts with respect to DCA form.
    ... Am I the new/young Peter Saxton or the very old Peter Saxton? ... I have taken on so many new clients recently. ... clients what morons they are, ... I guess the plumbers are not Polish? ...
    (uk.business.accountancy)
  • Re: New CIS scheme
    ... >>> I'd guess that the reason why the CIS scheme has been delayed is ... >>> Peter Saxton from London ... > very minimally (much less than the extra clients I am getting all the ... get a few extra black jacks in his stocking because that's all it will pay ...
    (uk.business.accountancy)
  • Re: New CIS scheme
    ... >>>I see that the new CIS scheme has now been deferred until Apr 07. ... >> Peter Saxton from London ... very minimally (much less than the extra clients I am getting all the ...
    (uk.business.accountancy)
  • Re: capital allowance computers 2005-2006?
    ... Did you not have enough staff to complete it within the ... "buying Xmas presents" is only a few day's work... ... "Peter Saxton" wrote ... have to do 80% of their clients tax returns in one month. ...
    (uk.business.accountancy)
  • Re: business or personal bank account
    ... "Peter Saxton" wrote ... > I treat my clients as adults whether they act like it or not. ...
    (uk.business.accountancy)