Re: Sage 10 - are VAT returns wrong?
- From: Keith <keith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 07:10:15 +0000
In message <gcesr2l8vh8lohpn7kl5qgp8drhig7861d@xxxxxxx>, nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes
Nogood Boyo <NogoodBoyo@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
Read the guidance. An invoice from a reputable agent should make it
clear that their invoice is merely for reimbursement and that it is not
valid for input tax purposes.
Fair enough; how do all the other (countless thousands) businesses
handle this situation?
Sage is the most commonly used accounting program. It has no provision
for suspending a particular purchase invoice from VAT claim-back until
somebody has told it that a particular piece of paper from C&E has
turned up.
Yes it does - you have to think outside the <VAT> box
There are two options - either use the <T9> default code on a temporary basis and change this to <T1> when VAT is paid.
Or enter the purchase using a Sage VAT code which is not incorporated in the VAT Return (say T6).
When your VAT payment is made to C&E/courier you merely journal entry the purchase and VAT from <T6> to <T1>.
The former method quarantines the transaction prior to VAT Return whereas the latter will include the purchase price but not the VAT in the VAT Return.
--
Keith replace nospam with ilf0rd
.
- References:
- Re: Sage 10 - are VAT returns wrong?
- From: Nogood Boyo
- Re: Sage 10 - are VAT returns wrong?
- Prev by Date: Re: Computations
- Next by Date: Re: Retail Sales and VAT Registration
- Previous by thread: Re: Sage 10 - are VAT returns wrong?
- Next by thread: Re: Sage 10 - are VAT returns wrong?
- Index(es):