Re: Partnership split
- From: Ronald Raygun <no.spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:11:43 GMT
Martin wrote:
And it's "different FROM".
I didn't want to say anything, but I agree vehemently.
The yanks say "different than" all the time, of course, but
we should not descend to their level.
It *can* be right, though, in contexts such as where the
difference is itself being compared:
If the partners' shares are different this year, and will also
be different next year, then it could well be the case that next
year they are *more different than* this year.
Speaking of language issues, I found the subject line of this
thread misleading. Clearly what is intended to be discussed
is how the profits and capital reserves of a partnership are
split amongst the partners, but the words "partnership split"
first painted a picture in my mind of a partnership being
dissolved, rended asunder, "split".
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Partnership split
- From: Keith
- Re: Partnership split
- From: Martin
- Re: Partnership split
- References:
- Partnership split
- From: Dave
- Re: Partnership split
- From: Peter Saxton
- Re: Partnership split
- From: Ronald Raygun
- Re: Partnership split
- From: Peter Saxton
- Re: Partnership split
- From: Martin
- Partnership split
- Prev by Date: Re: Partnership split
- Next by Date: Re: Partnership split
- Previous by thread: Re: Partnership split
- Next by thread: Re: Partnership split
- Index(es):