Re: Slightly off topic business question

In message <1156058417.179000.312420@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Troy Steadman <troysteadman@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes
Peter Saxton wrote:
On 19 Aug 2006 13:36:35 -0700, "Troy Steadman"
<troysteadman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >The link Peter has given you is almost 100% inappropriate.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Why?

I didn't criticise you, I didn't criticise your link. I merely ponted
out that the link is "is almost 100% inappropriate".

"Employing people"
"Grow your business"
"Buy or sell a business"

...are inappropriate. The vast majority of most of the other Headings
are innapropriate to a DIY couple hoping to do up an old house and let
it.

I don't agree, Troy. More than 50% of the 'headings' have some bearing on
the proposed activity.

Even for a 'DIY couple hoping to do up a house and rent it' matters such a grants, health & safety and tax (to name but three) are legitimate matters for review. Sales & marketing is appropriate for a letting agency, isn't it?

Your comment 'almost 100% inappropriate' is 100% inaccurate.

Match point. Advantage Peter.
--
Keith replace nospam with ilf0rd
.

Relevant Pages