Re: Alternative to Cardnet Chip and Pin Machine
- From: jjamies@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 30 Dec 2005 05:35:23 -0800
""2. That the cc co is magically liable for fraud just because
the retailer did something extra, which wasn't in the T&C's
as guaranteeing the payment? Nope, still not persuaded! ""
It's nice you agree that Thumbprinting reduces the risk of fraud (see
previous postings). It would be a very brave or stupid card issuer who
insisted on charging the cost of fraud to any retailer who furnished
the police with a print on a transactions slip.
AFAIK a chargeback has never occurred in this scenario. Criminals
however have been identified and caught where they've left their
print. The most notable being where a crook left their print on two
cheques.
Thumbprinting doesn't change the relationship between banker and
retailer, your correct but maybe it should. Retailers using the
Thumbprint system are providing a extra service but as they are not
experiencing chargeback costs then there's no reason I suppose
there's to change T&Cs.
By the way, card issuers award staff £50 per card for every stolen or
cloned card which they retrieve. Where Thumbprintings used, stolen and
cloned cards have been left on counters!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Alternative to Cardnet Chip and Pin Machine
- From: Nige
- Re: Alternative to Cardnet Chip and Pin Machine
- From: jjamies
- Re: Alternative to Cardnet Chip and Pin Machine
- From: Tim
- Re: Alternative to Cardnet Chip and Pin Machine
- From: jjamies
- Re: Alternative to Cardnet Chip and Pin Machine
- From: Tim
- Re: Alternative to Cardnet Chip and Pin Machine
- From: jjamies
- Re: Alternative to Cardnet Chip and Pin Machine
- From: Tim
- Alternative to Cardnet Chip and Pin Machine
- Prev by Date: Re: Alternative to Cardnet Chip and Pin Machine
- Next by Date: Re: Alternative to Cardnet Chip and Pin Machine
- Previous by thread: Re: Alternative to Cardnet Chip and Pin Machine
- Next by thread: Re: Alternative to Cardnet Chip and Pin Machine
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|