Re: WTD - PC/Midi connector

On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 in article <MPG.1d51e4ec84960cdf98982b@xxxxxxxxx>, Neil Barker <neil@xxxxxxxxxx> writes
In article <0wGRVKMI+85CFw$X@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, me@xxxxxxxxxxx says...
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 in article <MPG.1d50c81a7ffd62ee989825@xxxxxxxxx>, Neil Barker <neil@xxxxxxxxxx> writes
In article <LhzOBTUcHr5CFwo+@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, me@xxxxxxxxxxx says... 

I don't need to do any research.  It doesn't matter who Phil Kyle is,
except perhaps to you and Phil.  He is posting in u.a.c now due to your
behaviour elsewhere.    The only idiot I am worried about is the idiot
who likes to call himself "Neil Barker".


You were posting off topic, you were off charter, before I got involved
in this thread.  That's why I am involved, because of that and your past
record attacking others.


You can't blame your off topic posting on Phil or me or anyone else.
You have so often claimed that off topic posts will be the death of
u.a.c. Considering the aggression you have displayed towards others in
the past, you really ought to be posting to a higher standard yourself.
You have claimed to be a netcop.  In fact you are simply a trouble
maker.

Frankly sunshine, I couldn't give a toss what you think. 

Actually I rather think that you do, or otherwise you would not be
trying to shrug it off and hide my comments by snipping.  Your attempt
at setting Followup-To: poster suggests that you want a closer email
correspondence, but I'm not falling for that one.


You're very wrong. Not for the first time I hasten to add. The reason
that followups were set is to mitigate any lengthy thread here,

It always seems that awkward people like yourself can come up with odd excuses, but it doesn't wash. I doubt that anybody reading this actually believes you.

as the
"Let's get Barker" crew jump in with both feet first.

The "let's get Barker crew", as you put it, is the people you have pissed off over the years. If anybody is "getting" you, you have brought it on yourself.

It is also apparent that you do not care for the users of u.a.c in
general.

People such as yourself, no. 

What you
cannot understand is that by posting the way you do, you are giving the
fuckwit troll exactly what it wants


I can only see one fuckwit troll here, and that's Neil Barker.

- hence why I ignore and therefore
do not reply to it.

But you don't ignore him, do you? You made that obvious earlier in this thread and in previous threads, and encouraged him to respond to you. He's really getting to you, isn't he?

But you never were that bright when it comes to these things, were you
?

Somewhat brighter than you, Nellie. 

You have an awful lot to learn about "Phil", as you so lovingly call
him, you really do.

"lovingly call him"? You really are weird, Neil. He calls himself Phil, so that is the name I use for him. Anything else would be daft. You know, Neil, you're starting to make NLL look sane.

You really do have an obsession about this guy. If you know that Phil is really someone else, and it is really important that we know that, perhaps you should enlighten us. However, I think this is just more of your usual drivel.

NFOAD. 

NFOAD?  I wonder what that means?  Neil fucks off and dies, perhaps?

Just let me remind people that I am posting to this thread to remind Neil Barker that off topic posting, such as his post that I replied to initially, is contrary to the charter of u.a.c. Neil has made it his thing to aggressively attack others who have posted off topic, and doesn't have the decency to recognise and curb his own off topic posting. As such, he is a hypocrite, and a blight on this newsgroup.

His references to Phil Kyle in response to my posts are a pathetic attempt at a red herring. Perhaps if Neil Barker was consistent, he would be posting in reply to Phil, and advising Phil of the off topic nature of his posts. Instead he is attempting to justify his inconsistency with bluster and aggression.

--
John Blundell
Reply-to: address is valid.
Antispam From: address
These settings made for newsgroup, but may also appear in email replies.
.

Loading