Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable

On Fri, 2 May 2008 0:41:33 -0400, yomama@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote
(in message <LcmdneaA5driBofVnZ2dnUVZ_vWdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>):

you talk to the other person
in present moment. when they
remember the same memory
your scenario falls apart.

Not if the person you are talking to is a hallucination.

that must be it

Like most of the people here.

most ? do you have a scorecard ?

How else could I keep my hallucinations straight?

---Uncle Weasel

--

"I merely borrowed somebody else's Perl scripts, loaded them up on my
Linux shell account and then edited them using vi in Bash.
I think that pretty comprehensively demonstrates that I am not a geek!"
---Kirsten "I am not a geek!" Bayes

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: toy town
    ... No need to invoke the idea of `reality' at all. ... i would say that was an hallucination, ... upon reflection on the memory, it is not possible by common-sense physics ... perception is different to that of other species. ...
    (uk.people.support.depression)
  • Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
    ... remember the same memory ... your scenario falls apart. ... Not if the person you are talking to is a hallucination. ... I think that pretty comprehensively demonstrates that I am not a geek!" ...
    (talk.religion.buddhism)
  • Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
    ... remember the same memory ... your scenario falls apart. ... Not if the person you are talking to is a hallucination. ... ---Uncle Weasel ...
    (talk.religion.buddhism)
  • Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptablez
    ... remember the same memory ... your scenario falls apart. ... Not if the person you are talking to is a hallucination. ... ---Uncle Weasel ...
    (talk.religion.buddhism)
  • Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
    ... was real and was shared is to assume that the memory ... If your brain just made that experience up, ... your scenario falls apart. ... Not if the person you are talking to is a hallucination. ...
    (talk.religion.buddhism)