Re: Wait, what's George's unproblem again?
- From: "dee" <szewma@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 May 2006 09:31:37 -0700
,'""-=][^^@-==+ wrote:
"Mayura" <grfarm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4476f172_3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Some of the upshots of this being that e.g. you could have a 'convergent'in
model of psychological progress. What is 'divergent' will progressively
'drop off' from what is convergent. You can have a model that purports to
have universal applicability to every sentient being. One way or another
with rebirth and survival of bodily death and/or something else, there is
principle enough time for this psychological progress and any perceivablea
pattern of progress in this short life appears as just a short section of
longer pattern etc.
only when hanging on to the notion that
that which is seen as a unique or seperate
'life' continues as that seperate-ness once
form is relinquished. there is no basis for
verification that even the inhabitation of
form proves seperate-ness let alone
some phantasmagorical egoic " thanks,
but i can do it myself" syndrome.
It seems to be harder to conceive of a 'convergent' model of psychologicalthe
progress for a bunch of different contents of skin-bags. You could have
experience 'nibbana' or some meditative way-stage or the general effect ofis
it on one's general life or whatever as some kind of slightly more
convergent than most days item but that's about as far as it can go. What
'divergent' has barely anywhere to 'drop off' to. And partly because ofbritish
that, it's difficult to conceive of a model of psychological progress with
universal applicability. One is always going to be stuck with one's
male down's syndromeness or black lesbian bronx dwarfness or whatever andor
attempting to 'grow' some inherently different cherry stone or apple pip
acorn. And there isn't time to do much more than grab and adapt a fewto
passing psychotherapeutic odds and sods (from e.g. the Buddha) according
ones taste and temperament.
you are 'double mirror' wishing here. you want
a model of universal application that can square
peg its round holes according to one's seperate
taste and temperament. how do you generalize
a patterning that is specific and general at the
same time?
specific to general... relativity????
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Wait, what's George's unproblem again?
- From: ,'\"\"-=][^^@-==+
- Re: Wait, what's George's unproblem again?
- References:
- Wait, what's George's problem again?
- From: dkotschess@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Wait, what's George's problem again?
- From: Hollywood Lee
- Re: Wait, what's George's problem again?
- From: George Cherry
- Re: Wait, what's George's problem again?
- From: Hollywood Lee
- Re: Wait, what's George's problem again?
- From: George Cherry
- Re: Wait, what's George's problem again?
- From: dkotschess@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Wait, what's George's problem again?
- From: George Cherry
- Re: Wait, what's George's problem again?
- From: Mayura
- Re: Wait, what's George's problem again?
- From: George Cherry
- Re: Wait, what's George's problem again?
- From: Mayura
- Re: Wait, what's George's problem again?
- From: Déjà Fu
- Re: Wait, what's George's problem again?
- From: Mayura
- Re: Wait, what's George's unproblem again?
- From: ,'\"\"-=][^^@-==+
- Wait, what's George's problem again?
- Prev by Date: Re: Wait, what's George's unproblem again?
- Next by Date: Re: Wait, what's George's unproblem again?
- Previous by thread: Re: Wait, what's George's unproblem again?
- Next by thread: Re: Wait, what's George's unproblem again?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|