Re: WHAT IS KARMAL APPLELLATIONZ, and how does it work?




"stumper" <stumper@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:JUOdnRxZqtQTPavZUSdV9g@xxxxxxxxxx
Jen wrote:

"stumper" <stumper@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:A0mdnT3x89_xBKvZUSdV9g@xxxxxxxxxx
Jen wrote:

"Demon Sky" <sameer.joshi.ai@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1144388282.477392.308660@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Jen wrote:


laws of physics are being challenged
daily. the speed of light was always thought
to be constant but now they think
otherwise. quantum mechanics is also
turning many long held beliefs upside
down.
No Jen, the upper speed of light is still constant. They slowed it
down
py passing it through a medium (the Bose Einstien condensate), but
that
didn't change the theories.
Speed Of Light May Not Be Constant, Physicist Suggests

A University of Toronto professor believes that one of the most
sacrosanct
rules of 20th-century science -- that the speed of light has always
been
the
same - is wrong. Ever since Einstein proposed his special theory of
relativity in 1905, physicists have accepted as fundamental principle
that
the speed of light -- 300 million metres per second -- is a constant
and
that nothing has, or can, travel faster. John Moffat of the physics
department disagrees - light once travelled much faster than it does
today,
he believes.

Recent theory and observations about the origins of the universe would
appear to back up his belief. For instance, theories of the origin of
the
universe -- the "Big Bang"- suggest that very early in the universe's
development, its edges were farther apart than light, moving at a
constant
speed, could possibly have travelled in that time. To explain this,
scientists have focused on strange, unknown and as-yet-undiscovered
forms of
matter that produce gravity that repulses objects.

Moffat's theory - that the speed of light at the beginning of time was
much
faster than it is now - provides an answer to some of these cosmology
problems. "It is easier for me to question Einstein's theory than it
is
to
assume there is some kind of strange, exotic matter around me in my
kitchen." His theory could also help explain astronomers' discovery
last
year that the universe's expansion is accelerating. Moffat's paper,
co-authored with former U of T researcher Michael Clayton, appeared in
a
recent edition of the journal Physics Letters.

CONTACT: Bruce Rolston
U of T Public Affairs
(416) 978-6974
bruce.rolston@xxxxxxxxxxx


In that case,
we better wait for a while.

Is this theory crucial to your argument?

there is no argument. my statement was
simply that what was once thought to be
true in the laws of physics is changing.

you, like many others in here, are simply
adept at reading what you thought i said
into what i actually said.




That's called understanding.
We are all limited that way, you know.

understanding doesn't mean taking
what someone says and spinning it
until it meets with your tunnel vision
conceptual cage building strategy, but
i'm sure you will continue in this type
of misinterpretation much the same as
you have misinterpreted this reality
into your present unawakened status.

carry on.



.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: WHAT IS KARMAL APPLELLATIONZ, and how does it work?
    ... turning many long held beliefs upside ... physicists have accepted as fundamental ... That's called understanding. ... of misinterpretation much the same as ...
    (talk.religion.buddhism)
  • Re: WHAT IS KARMAL APPLELLATIONZ, and how does it work?
    ... turning many long held beliefs upside ... physicists have accepted as fundamental principle ... Recent theory and observations about the origins of the universe would ... of misinterpretation much the same as ...
    (talk.religion.buddhism)
  • Re: WHAT IS KARMAL APPLELLATIONZ, and how does it work?
    ... turning many long held beliefs upside ... physicists have accepted as fundamental ... That's called understanding. ... of misinterpretation much the same as ...
    (talk.religion.buddhism)
  • Re: Galactic pancake mystery solved
    ... I have nothing against theoretical physicists who ply their trade and work every day to expand our understanding. ... That said, I'm bothered by the increasing use of computer of simulations that are visually appealing, but lack any depth in their underlying structure. ... Even though it was a modern, well instrumented facility, he was concerned that the tunnel would eventually be closed because students and most faculty preferred simulations and computer models to the relative drudgery associated with actual physical measurements. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Survival langauge
    ... > My understanding is that physicists and mathematicians say that a ... > well established that there is a physical limit to measurability and ... "infinite precision," but my layman's understanding of Heisenberg's ... Interested amateur ...
    (alt.usage.english)

Loading