Re: New names All Around ( was Re: Societies worse off)
- From: "George Cherry" <GWCherryHatesGreenEggsAndSpam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 21:30:56 -0400
"stumper" <stumper@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dUidndBZY4jN3KbeUSdV9g@xxxxxxxxxx
> George Cherry wrote:
>> "stumper" <stumper@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:S1ednfoFr-AmrqbeUSdV9g@xxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>>George Cherry wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Lee Dillion" <leedillion@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>news:1127944733.023468.68890@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>George Cherry wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>If you like (non-anagrammatic) puzzles, I'm thinking of
>>>>>>changing my t.r.b. name to "Eddy". Can anyone guess
>>>>>>why?
>>>>>
>>>>>Hi Eddy:
>>>>>
>>>>>Not sure about the reason for the new name.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Oh boy, here's my chance to explain "Eddy". No I'm not calling
>>>>myself Eddy because I think I'm the Jack Russell Terrier in Frazier.
>>>>
>>>>Joko Beck wrote in her book "Nothing Special" the following.
>>>>"We are rather like whirlpools in the river of life. In flowing for-
>>>>ward, a river or stream may hit many rocks, branches, or irregu-
>>>>larities ... causing whirlpools to spring up ... here and there.
>>>>Water entering one whirlpool quickly passes through and re-
>>>>joins the river ... . Though for short periods, it seems to be dis-
>>>>tinguishable as a separate [entity], the water in the whirlpools
>>>>is just the river itself. The stability of a whirlpool is only tempo-
>>>>rary.... However, we want to think that this little whirlpool that
>>>>we are isn't part of the stream. We want to see ourselves as
>>>>permanent and stable. Our whole energy goes into trying to
>>>>protect our supposed separateness ...."
>>>>
>>>>eddy: a current of water or air running contrary to the main
>>>>current; esp.: a circular current: whirlpool
>>>>
>>>>So I'm Eddy. Hello, are you Eddy too?
>>>>
>>>>Eddy
>>>>
>>>
>>>So you couldn't go with the flow?
>>
>>
>> Oh ***. You're screwing me up with another metaphor.
>> I'm a flow man too: the "flow experience" and all that.
>>
>> Flo
>
>
> I was just kidding.
> Not a bad perspective.
>
> How do you relate to other eddies?
Compete with 'em.
(Just kidding; I let 'em win .)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New names All Around ( was Re: Societies worse off)
- From: stumper
- Re: New names All Around ( was Re: Societies worse off)
- References:
- Societies worse off 'when they have God on their side'
- From: Lee Dillion
- Re: Societies worse off 'when they have God on their side'
- From: Ch'an Fu
- Re: Societies worse off 'when they have God on their side'
- From: George Cherry
- New names All Around ( was Re: Societies worse off)
- From: Lee Dillion
- Re: New names All Around ( was Re: Societies worse off)
- From: George Cherry
- Re: New names All Around ( was Re: Societies worse off)
- From: stumper
- Re: New names All Around ( was Re: Societies worse off)
- From: George Cherry
- Re: New names All Around ( was Re: Societies worse off)
- From: stumper
- Societies worse off 'when they have God on their side'
- Prev by Date: Re: Every sentient one of us needs it.
- Next by Date: Re: New names All Around ( was Re: Societies worse off)
- Previous by thread: Re: New names All Around ( was Re: Societies worse off)
- Next by thread: Re: New names All Around ( was Re: Societies worse off)
- Index(es):