Re: This is NOT Paul Andrew Hammond
- From: PaulHammond <pahammond@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 06:57:08 -0700 (PDT)
On 25 Jun, 03:41, 303 <wahidaza...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 25, 6:12 am, PaulHammond <pahamm...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You aren't interested in serious debate, only point-scoring.
Debate assumes there is some level of good faith amongst parties.
You're quite right.
That's why talking to you is a wast of time.
It's quite funny to wind you up, though. Especially when you spout
nonsense about perverting the course of justice and witter on about my
need to get solicitors to protect myself from your "dangerous"
internet presence.
Any timescale possible on that one?
Go on. I DARE you.
Give us a time by which you intend to instruct your wee white mice
solitors to serve papers on the person you actually believe to be the
real Paul Hammond, thus preventing my posting here as it would be sub-
judice.
I bet you can't.
.
- References:
- Re: This is NOT Paul Andrew Hammond
- From: PaulHammond
- Re: This is NOT Paul Andrew Hammond
- From: لا اله الا الله حقاً حقاً
- Re: This is NOT Paul Andrew Hammond
- From: Viv
- Re: This is NOT Paul Andrew Hammond
- From: Death to Haifan Bahaism
- Re: This is NOT Paul Andrew Hammond
- From: Viv
- Re: This is NOT Paul Andrew Hammond
- From: PaulHammond
- Re: This is NOT Paul Andrew Hammond
- From: PaulHammond
- Re: This is NOT Paul Andrew Hammond
- Prev by Date: Re: This is NOT Paul Andrew Hammond
- Next by Date: Re: This is NOT Paul Andrew Hammond
- Previous by thread: Re: This is NOT Paul Andrew Hammond
- Next by thread: Re: This is NOT Paul Andrew Hammond
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
