Re: This is NOT Paul Andrew Hammond
- From: لا اله الا الله حقاً حقاً <wahidazal66@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 21, 11:17 am, PaulHammond <pahamm...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sorry, what law do you assert that I've broken?
'False impersonation', 'conspiracy to perpetrate fraud', 'libel' and a
host of other things as well. Have your IT committee solicitors
contact me and I'll give them more charges you can be nailed with in
your very own UK jusrisdiction too.
Anyway, Good luck finding out my address when you want to serve court
papers on me -
Don't worry, I am an expert at pulling rats like you out of their rat
holes.
I have a feeling these things need to be delivered in
writing - and how does Australian law apply to me while I'm living in
England?
Have your IT commitee solicitors explain to you the concept of private
international law and the manner in which both torts and criminal
charges can be fit and applied to them.
<big BS snip>
W
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: This is NOT Paul Andrew Hammond
- From: All Bad
- Re: This is NOT Paul Andrew Hammond
- From: PaulHammond
- Re: This is NOT Paul Andrew Hammond
- From: Viv
- Re: This is NOT Paul Andrew Hammond
- References:
- Re: This is NOT Paul Andrew Hammond
- From: PaulHammond
- Re: This is NOT Paul Andrew Hammond
- Prev by Date: Re: HAIFAN cultists manipulating/vandalizing wikipedia entries: Vandalism of JUAN COLE entry by MARussellPESE
- Next by Date: Re: Viv Jacobson/Paul Hammond misdirecting and deflecting
- Previous by thread: Re: This one's a keeper
- Next by thread: Re: This is NOT Paul Andrew Hammond
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
