Re: Responding to attacks and misrepresentations
- From: jimhabegger@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 28 May 2007 10:32:07 -0700
On May 28, 1:01 pm, diamondsouled <r...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Is it being an enemy of Baha'is to point out the direct contradiction
between the words of the UHJ and the words of Abdul'-Baha?
Not in my view. That's precisely what I've been doing in the
discussion about responding, in Internet discussions, to people who
are promoting other Guardians after Shoghi Effendi, except that I'm
also pointing out the direct contradiction between the words of Abdu'l-
Baha and the words of Abdu'l'-Baha.
Jim
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Responding to attacks and misrepresentations
- From: diamondsouled
- 19 Terms and Conditions for the Unconditional Surrender of the haifan bahaim cult: Death to Haifan Bahaism
- From: Death to Haifan Bahaism
- Re: Responding to attacks and misrepresentations
- References:
- Responding to attacks and misrepresentations
- From: jimhabegger
- Re: Responding to attacks and misrepresentations
- From: jimhabegger
- Re: Responding to attacks and misrepresentations
- From: diamondsouled
- Responding to attacks and misrepresentations
- Prev by Date: Re: No prohibition against same sex intimacy
- Next by Date: Re: How to use the writings of Baha'u'llah, Abdu'l-Baha, Shoghi Effendi, and the Universal House of Justice
- Previous by thread: Re: Responding to attacks and misrepresentations
- Next by thread: 19 Terms and Conditions for the Unconditional Surrender of the haifan bahaim cult: Death to Haifan Bahaism
- Index(es):