Re: Kents 'specific' Baha'i Technique behaviour
- From: bn872@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Michael McKenny)
- Date: 30 Mar 2007 12:28:28 GMT
Hi, Rod.
(rwicks@xxxxxxxxxxx) writes:
Straight up question Michael-
If I publicly declare that you are a "liar, cheat and a thief" but I
do not at
Any stage say what your 'lie' was- what you 'cheated' at or what you
stole
.=2E..would I be making an accusation regarding your *behaviour* or your
*character*?
Please...I'd like to know.
Straight up answer. Ad Hominems, remarks concerning who it is that said
something, rather than what is said (ad rem) are judged by formal logic
off topic, irrelevant and of no substance.
Baha'u'llah said that this is an age for humanity to recognize it is a
single species, get its act together and live as the peaceful inhabitants
of one global country. That idea can be assessed on its own merits. Whether
or not Baha'u'llah was a thief, or anybody else was a thief is irrelevant.
I'll answer the rest of your post separately.
Peace,
Michael
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Kents 'specific' Baha'i Technique behaviour
- From: honghsien
- Re: Kents 'specific' Baha'i Technique behaviour
- References:
- Kents 'specific' Baha'i Technique behaviour
- From: rwicks
- Re: Kents 'specific' Baha'i Technique behaviour
- From: rwicks
- Kents 'specific' Baha'i Technique behaviour
- Prev by Date: The esoteric meaning of Mustaghath
- Next by Date: Re: Kents 'specific' Baha'i Technique behaviour
- Previous by thread: Re: Kents 'specific' Baha'i Technique behaviour
- Next by thread: Re: Kents 'specific' Baha'i Technique behaviour
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|