Re: THE BAHAI TECHNIQUE ...any further proof required?

Another user of Beliefnet wrote this epithet on the Rodney thread:
--------------------------------
Oh, Rodney, Rodney, Rodney, Rodney!

"Anyone who makes an allegation and refuses substantiation is a low life
***.."

You can define yourself out of anything, can you?

So long as you say it is so; we have to accept your wobbly word, do we?

Your method is simple. Toss out allegations of all types, get confronted,
then ask for proof, then deny the sufficiency of the proof, boast about how
you won and start the whole miserable cycle again.

From time to time throw up a situation to which folks may respond, based on
your points, then reveal the basis of your falsehood and dance about how you
fooled someone.

Your vanity has caught you up how many times, now?

Speak up, Rodney!

Try to keep them short, too.

They'll be more entertaining.

-----------------------

So long as you are investigating....

--Kent


"Viv" <viv_jacobson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1175154906.037400.176640@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 28 Mar, 14:46, rwi...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Is that it folks?

Are there no Baha'is who are prepared to apply 'the independent
investigation of truth' to examining concrete evidence of the Baha'i
Technique in action?

I see - no reply within two hours so a follow-on message trying to
make out that silence means you are right in your comments and have
struck home.

No reply within two hours might also mean that some people have more
to their lives than the Internet and sitting on it waiting with bated
breath to engage, and they fit it into a schedule of other, more
important things. It's called having a life.

Anyway, if you seek response you may refer to my earlier one of this
morning.

Viv.



.