Abbas Effendi as an example of hypocrisyRe: Mirza Aqa Khan Kirmani and Haji Mirza Yahya Dawlat-Abadi : Examples of hypocrisy and duplicity

It is a consistent line of these baha'i cultists - and one echoed by
Cole in his re_imagined, pseudo-scholarship as well - that Agha Khan
Kirmani and Ahmad Ruhi were hypocrites for doing what they were forced
to do by necessity, and what the Husayalists themselves were doing as
well until the 1920s: i.e. taqiyyih.

Until the 1920s, when Shoghidelic took over, all the baha'i parties in
Palestine were dissimulating their real beliefs. Abbas Effendi attended
Friday (namaz jum'i) congregations in Acre for the sole purpose of
keeping appearances and to continue to have the Muslim religious
authorities think the Baha'is were actually Muslim, albeit Sufi. Until
well into the British Mandate the Baha'i leaders of both households not
only did nothing to dissuade the local population of this view, but
actually activelly encouraged it. However, in tried and true baha'i
hypocrisy, the Unitarians got labelled as the hypocrites by the Abbas
Effendists for continuing the charade and insisting that Husayn 'Ali
Nuri was a Muslim and Sufi Pir.

Now they are trotting out Shaykh'u-Ra'is Qajar as the most prominent
Baha'i leader of the Constitutionalist period, a man who outright
publically denied being a Baha'i on several dozen occasions when his
Muslim enemies accused him of such. Whatever credit Baha'is now are
trying to take, it appears at least outwardly that Shaykh'u-Ra'is was
publically distancing himself from the Baha'is - and most probably
wasn't a Baha'i at all. If they keep insisting he was, then they need
to explain why he was publically dissimulating so vigorously but then
have the gall to accuse the fathers of the Revolution (Ahmad Ruhi/Agha
Khan Kirmani) for what they themselves were doing just as vigorously -
taqqiyyih/dissimulation.

As history has testified again and again, hypocrisy runs through the
veins of all baha'is, and is the very mother's milk of these
people...correction...animals...correction...scum!

W


steveblomberg2@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
http://www.bayanic.com/notes/alleg02/alleg-B-02.html

Hey Libel!
God you look ugly!

Husayn-Ali denounces the Primal Point And His Ancestor
The Primal Point was a Sayyid, a descendant of the Family of the
Prophet. In his Kashf-al-Hiyal, Vol. I., 6th impression, P. 26,
Abd-al-Husayn Ayati surnamed Awara, a prominent Bahai missionary and
Hand of the Cause, who abjured Bahaism and returned to the fold of
Islam says: "Four years prior to his death I visited the late
Sipah-Salar Muhammad Wali Khan in his home, accompanied by Nasrullah
Bazarof, who was out to convert him into Bahaism". After Nasrullah,
had delivered himself of his speech of conversion, our host smiled and
said: "My late father related to me: "I was in the house of the
grand Vizir Aqa Khan when Mirza Husayn Ali of Nur [i.e. Husayn-Ali] was
brought in under escort on the very day on which an attempt was made on
the life of Nasir-al-Din Shah [August 15, 1852]. The Grand Vizir spoke
to him in harsh terms: "As a compatriot I was on friendly terms with
your father. He was not a bad man. You might have taken his place and
attained a post in the Court as a Scribe. But you are such a wretched
being as to truckle to Sayyid-i-BÂB; what sort of madness he was
obsessed with is unknown; and now you instigate [people] to murder the
Shah?"
Mirza [i.e. Husayn-Ali] answered immediately: 'I have no belief in
Sayyid-i-BÂB; may be in his ancestor too ...' But at once he held
his tongue. The Grand Vizir expressed strong disapproval of him saying,
'don't be impertinent', and by a gesture of hand ordered his
dismissal and he was taken away. After this dismissal and confinement
in prison the Grand Vizir said: "Mirza Husayn Ali made this statement
involuntarily. He told the truth when he said that he had no belief in
the BÂB's ancestor too; for religion is not in his line at all; he
has no aim other than gaining an advantage."

Husayn-Ali's objection to Mirza Hadi of Dowlat Abad
When Husayn-Ali in Edirne started out his pretensions Mirza Hadi wrote
a refutation of Husayn-Ali's pretensions and sent a copy of it to him
in Acre. This incurred Husayn-Ali's wrath, which was aggravated by
Mirza Hadi's remarks to a follower of Husayn-Ali to the effect that a
special provision in the Persian Bayan, Wáhid V, BÂB 15, declared the
liquid semen from which He whom god will make manifest is to proceed to
be ceremonially clean. This provision presupposes the birth of Him whom
god will make manifest from parents of whom would be of the BÂBi
Faith. At the time Husayn-Ali was alive and kicking.

Husayn-Ali's anger at the passage in Bayan
These remarks were duly reported to Husayn-Ali. The challenge evoked a
riposte from Husayn-Ali, in which he not only denounced Mirza Hadi but
also denigrated the Primal Point, his benefactor, but for whom
Husayn-Ali would not have staked out his pretensions. In his riposte
Husayn-Ali states that "the purity of the semen from which Him whom
god will make manifest did not hang on the word of his creatures" and
that "the station of the Point", whose return Husayn-Ali alleged to
be, "was established by Him whom god will make manifest", with whom
Husayn-Ali alleged identity. Tablets of Husayn-Aliullah (Ishraqat,
Persian Works, Tarazat, Tajaliat), Bombay Edition, PP. 24-28.

.

Relevant Pages