Re: Posts which have been rejected on SRB
- From: "diamondsouled" <rowe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 Jun 2006 22:10:46 -0700
Howdy Ron,
I had to edit the post considerably to get it through. If you check
them both out you'll see the difference.
You are right in noting that things have seemed to loosen up a bit on
SRB though.
None of my posts were getting through till recently.
Yours Larry
-------
Ron House wrote:
diamondsouled wrote:
Follows is a second post rejected for the same stated reason. It
appears that the flaming of contributors to SRB is allowed and even
encouraged for and by the moderators of SRB but when a well reasoned
answer is given to refute such personal flaming they are systematically
censored.
Howdy Brendan,
Actually contrary to Susan's personal interpretation of my feelings
about Shoghi Effendi I have a great deal of respect for the man. I
even attribute my propensity to use run on sentences and many
semi-colons to having read and re-read much of what he wrote.
...
I have just read this post on SRB. In fact, I looked today and was
surprised that their moderation looked much fairer than normal. Many
real articles (not the usual Dorothy Dixers) pointing out difficulties.
And I hear Susan is the moderator letting it on? I think things really
are looking up in the world.
--
Ron House house@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.sci.usq.edu.au/staff/house
Ethics website: http://www.sci.usq.edu.au/staff/house/goodness
.
- References:
- Posts which have been rejected on SRB
- From: diamondsouled
- Re: Posts which have been rejected on SRB
- From: diamondsouled
- Re: Posts which have been rejected on SRB
- From: Ron House
- Posts which have been rejected on SRB
- Prev by Date: Re: How many Bahais are there?
- Next by Date: Re: How many Bahais are there?
- Previous by thread: Re: Posts which have been rejected on SRB
- Next by thread: Re: Posts which have been rejected on SRB
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|