Re: hands of the cause
- From: "Randy Burns" <randy.burns4@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 19:41:10 GMT
It's not much different from the arguments in the early Christian Church
over leadership, is it Bob? In fact you would be hard put to name a
religion that didn't have this problem. So, is your argument that no
religion with a controversy over leadership can be a legitimate religion?
Shall we scratch Christianity off the list now?
Cheers, Randy
--
"Bob" <RobertArvay@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1148997813.284978.170840@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I have observed this debate for a number of years now. This
controversy about guardianship is the fly in the ointment of Baha'i
claims to be a divinely ordained religion. The fiasco of a lack of
succession indicates an appalling absence, not only of divine guidance,
but of common sense, in the Bahai institutions.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: hands of the cause
- From: Anthony Page
- Re: hands of the cause
- References:
- hands of the cause
- From: Anthony Page
- Re: hands of the cause
- From: All Bad
- Re: hands of the cause
- From: Bob
- hands of the cause
- Prev by Date: Re: hands of the cause
- Next by Date: Re: hands of the cause
- Previous by thread: Re: hands of the cause
- Next by thread: Re: hands of the cause
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
