Re: Abdu'l-Baha on Black Africans being "savages"
- From: "Anthony Page" <anthonypage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 21:43:37 -0400
"All Bad" <All_BadNOT_REALLY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:PvGdnfbkyp7Zjs3ZnZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Anthony Page wrote:me, a
Darrick,
Can't you make your points without silly teen insults?
Anthony, Anthony, Anthony ? . ? . ? I think it is who he is. Like one
or two other induhvijewels who frequent the place, Darrick get's testy
when his mistakes are pointed out to him.
It's not difficult.
Again, using the word '***' says more about you than it does about
heterosexual father of four.
My young children debate more maturely than that.
Think of it as venting, or perhaps something of a more toilet-friendly
nature. I don't think he is trying to debate.
I believe that Darrick draws comfort from the familiarity of rejection,
and he seeks it out. By addressing people as ***, ***, and
COCKSUCKER, he improves the likelihood that he will be rejected. By
posting his wild theories that 'Abdu'l Baha agrees with his racist
views, he improves the likelihood that he will be rejected. By posting
stilted, misogynistic views of women, particularly to women, or in a
Baha'i environment, he improves the likelihood that he will be rejected.
By doing these things where he can be confident of other people's
response, he gains control, or seems to himself, to gain control of them.
Darrick may be unusual, but I doubt he values rejection directly. I
think it about control and he can control the response of "rejection"
with a high degree of confidence.
- All Bad
Thank you. That's very interesting and has a certain ring of authenticity.
Without being insulting to him, especially since I don't know him, your
explanation reminds me of a troubled teen, who acts out out as a means of
getting attention, and therefore some kind of 'place' in the world.
It's quite sad. I shall not respond in a way that feeds such a
self-destructive need anymore.
use
"Darrick" <darrick_evenson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1146096794.241903.109020@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Anthony,
They don't want TRUTH ***. They love the LIE, and that is what they
shall have.
Because their spiritual father is the father of lies.
Anthony Page wrote:
Darrick,
Do you honestly believe that this sort of astonishing, foul-mouthed,
tirade
is going to encourage anyone to take anything else you say seriously on
here? Can you not disagree with this person, even vigorously, without
resorting to gutter language?
You seem to have an interest in various religious texts. Perhaps you
admire
some of those texts. Do any of those Holy texts contain such gutter
language?
Swearing stops being cool when you leave your teen years behind. To
it
as an adult belittles you far, far more than the intended recipient.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Abdu'l-Baha on Black Africans being "savages"
- From: All Bad
- Re: Abdu'l-Baha on Black Africans being "savages"
- References:
- Abdu'l-Baha on Black Africans being "savages"
- From: Darrick
- Re: Abdu'l-Baha on Black Africans being "savages"
- From: Viv
- Re: Abdu'l-Baha on Black Africans being "savages"
- From: Darrick
- Re: Abdu'l-Baha on Black Africans being "savages"
- From: Viv
- Re: Abdu'l-Baha on Black Africans being "savages"
- From: Darrick
- Re: Abdu'l-Baha on Black Africans being "savages"
- From: Anthony Page
- Re: Abdu'l-Baha on Black Africans being "savages"
- From: Darrick
- Re: Abdu'l-Baha on Black Africans being "savages"
- From: Anthony Page
- Re: Abdu'l-Baha on Black Africans being "savages"
- From: All Bad
- Abdu'l-Baha on Black Africans being "savages"
- Prev by Date: Ahmad, Kazim and Smith
- Next by Date: Re: Homa & Mona at AIPAC
- Previous by thread: Re: Abdu'l-Baha on Black Africans being "savages"
- Next by thread: Re: Abdu'l-Baha on Black Africans being "savages"
- Index(es):