Re: Picture of Joel M?
- From: wahidazal66@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 7 Oct 2005 16:49:43 -0700
Hiya, dear Girlie,
There is saying from my part of the world that a man who hides his face
has something to hide. When Brent Reed and I briefly corresponded back
in 2000-2001 I was very taken by how forthcoming he was to talk about
Jacques Soghomonian as well as how forthcoming Jacques Soghomonian was
himself to share a part of himself with others who asked. I did not
have to ask Brent twice for a picture of Soghomonian, and he sent me
two pictures when I asked for only one. That said a lot to me about
Jacques Soghomonian and Brent Reed both.
I have read the words of Remey and Joel and they are utter crap. Other
than harping endlessly about his guardianship, Joel has really nothing
to say or offer the world. I would like to see Joel discuss, just once,
an in-depth metaphysical question such as the ontological nature of
reality, rather than endlessly ranting on about his purported
guardianship. What has Joel have to say, for instance, about the
ecology and environment of the planet and its rapid depletion and
deterioration at the hands of greedy multinational corporate
capitalism? What has Joel got to say about the Green House effect and
the Kyoto Protocal? What about the logging and destruction of the
Amazon that is being destroyed at the rate of a football field per day?
What does Joel have to say about social democracy? Civil rights? The
rights in the word place? What is Joel's central magnus opus? He has
none and has never said anything of the sort. He can't even read Arabic
or Persian to be any kind of credible authoritative interpretor so be
taken seriously by people like me.
In the Book of the Point of Kashan (nuqtat'ul-kaf) Hajji Mirza Jani,
its author, relates how when Basir-i-Hindi made his claim to divinity
in Baghdad, His Holiness the Morning of Praeternity (Subh-i-Azal), the
legitimate successor not to mention the actual Return of the Bab in the
station of mirrorhood and vicegerency,upheld the claim but on the
grounds that such claims are made without the promptings of the base
ego and demonstrated by some kind of coherent evidentiary proof. Sadly,
neither your prophet "baha'u'llah" - who as far as I am concerned in
that picture looks like the spitting image of the devil himself - met
that criteria, nor any of his lineal successors, let alone a
self-consumed, egotistical upper middle class American socialite such
as Mason Remey or his successors. Pepe Remey had the good sense to
finally realize that all this guardian talk was BS and bail-out of the
whole thing. Because of status, money and a bunch of goo-goo-eyed
brain-dead cultists who refuse to exercise the grey matter between
their ears given to them by the Almighty to think for themselves, Joel
M continues in his charade, thinking he is one of the elect of the
Joel M could not carry the jockstraps of a single average joe Iranian
baha'i who knows a spittle of Arabic from grade school - which Mr
Nosrat clearly doesn't - let alone to be any wali amr'ullah, ergo why
he is afraid to actually show his ugly face to the world. He knows if
he does the game is all over - in a second! I have challenged this
bogus guardian and his hands of the cause to a live public debate, i.e.
contemporary mubahilah. My challenge stands if they have the cahones to
Now it stands to reason that those who are afraid to show their
pictures and what they look like are actually girlie men.
'Aleyki Nur/ Upon you be the Light!
- Prev by Date: Re: @@Compassion for the Mentally ill@@
- Next by Date: Re: Beliefnet Mormon Debate poster
- Previous by thread: Re: Picture of Joel M?
- Next by thread: Re: Picture of Joel M?