Re: From a non-Bah'ai: re-envisioning progressive revelation
- From: All Bad <All_BadNOT_REALLY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 19:32:44 -0400
JanetDoe wrote:
I am not a Baha'i, but many of the people in my social circle are (and devoutly so). Thus, in the interest of maintaining a connection with them, I often converse about the Baha'i Faith and the tenets and perspectives thereof. From what I have read and heard, I doubt I will ever become Baha'i, but this does not mean I do not appreciate the aims of the faith or the wonderful people I've met who are part of it.
One of the reasons for my reluctance to assuming a Baha'i identity lies
in the idea of progressive revelation. Or rather, the manner in which
it is presented. The "grade school" analogy in particular has been a
sore spot for me.
Of course.
Despite the sincerity and earnestness of the expression, deep down I often feel a tad insulted. In a roundabout way, it insinuates that the beliefs of non-Baha'is are primitive and irrelevant.
I thought the problem was that it implied that Baha'is are more advanced, rather than the non-Baha'i religions being irrelevant. The upside of the grade school" analogy is that it implies that the whole thing is part of a single system, rather than rants about the need to burn witches or that non-Baha'is are worshipping demons.
For a while, I simply rejected progressive revelation outright. However, as I've been thinking about it more, a new idea has come to me about it. What if progressive revelation, instead of attaching itself to this idea of human advancement from "low" to "high" (whatever that is supposed to mean), actually referred to increasing completeness in our understanding of the divine?
Let me use an analogy. The typical view of progress is like a ladder, where each ring goes up, up, up until you reach God (or whatever). The view I'm putting forth is more like a pie, where each piece together creates a more complete vision of the whole. It is completeness that is the goal, not "progress." With the emergence of new faiths and new ways of perceiving and understanding ourselves and the world(s) around us, we get a more complete standard of What It's All About. With this, it becomes possible for each faith to express itself and contribute to this wholeness equally and on its own terms.
I'm not sure how receptive the Baha'is I know will be to this idea, but I'm open to dialogue here and perhaps asking questions that will deepen our understanding of things.
I think there are really two things going on with progressive revelation and I appreciate that you are hitting the problems with the grade school analogy. On the one hand, man always interprets the revelation, and, in the process, often corrupts it. For example, the story of Adam and Eve was interpreted to imply that women were weak, and not to be trusted with important decisions like 'what's for lunch?' By the time of Christ, the Rabbis were interpreting verses about dedication to G-D to imply that adult children need not concern themselves with supporting infirm parents. By the time of Muhammad, Priests were interpreting statements in the New Testament that God was not essentially One, but really three persons. These sorts of things were not really in the prior revelation, but incorrectly inferred by man. These things do not get corrected by theologians, so a revelation is needed to correct misinterpretation.
On the other hand, society is changing. In addition to correcting truths, the revelation contextualizes itself for the target society. North India 2500 years ago had plenty of religion and theology, maybe even too much and too many gods, and so there was less point in discussing God. Our time is a time of globalization, and we have a revelation which addresses that at this time. Addressing globalization 2500 years ago would be premature.
I don't think that man, with our finite mind, can have a truly complete understanding of God.
I hope this helps. - Pat
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: From a non-Bah'ai: re-envisioning progressive revelation
- From: JanetDoe
- Re: From a non-Bah'ai: re-envisioning progressive revelation
- References:
- From a non-Bah'ai: re-envisioning progressive revelation
- From: JanetDoe
- From a non-Bah'ai: re-envisioning progressive revelation
- Prev by Date: 'Abdu'l-Baha and Charles Mason Remey
- Next by Date: Re: From a non-Bah'ai: re-envisioning progressive revelation
- Previous by thread: Susan Maneck, Baha'i scholar:
- Next by thread: Re: From a non-Bah'ai: re-envisioning progressive revelation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|