Re: March for Tibet's Independence 2006
- From: pi3_1416us@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 30 Jun 2006 17:51:37 -0700
bmoore@xxxxxxx wrote:
In that case what is the so called Tibet Independence Movement and
Hong
Independence Movement about? What are they supposed to be independent
from?
Pretty clearly, from China. Not sure what your point is.
22/7
Let's see what was being post:
1) LeoKin wrote:
Tibet is part a China, Hong Kong SAR is too
2) You disagreed and rediculed LeoKin.
That means you believe that Tibet and Hong Kong are not part of China.
If they are not part of China and they are already independent, then
what is the fuss about the so called Hong Kong Independent Movement and
the Tibetan Independent movement.
May be you are saying that Hong Kong is not part of China, not already
indepenet but part of the United Kingdom, then the HIM should be about
independence from the United Kingdom.
May be you are saying that Tibet is not part of China, not already
indepenet but part of the "I don't know what", then the TIM should be
about independence from the "I don't know what".
On the other hand, if you are saying that the HIM and TIM are seeking
independence "Pretty clearly, from China", then that means Hong Kong
and Tibet are at least for now, and thought it should not have been,
could not have been and would not have been, part of China.
There is nothing to argue about the statement that Hong Kong and Tibet
are part of China as it says nothing about Hong Kong and Tibet should
be, would be, could be, should have been, would have been or could have
been.
22/7
.
- Next by Date: New rail link China's one-way ticket to Tibet
- Next by thread: New rail link China's one-way ticket to Tibet
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|