Re: Why The Media Embraced '911 Truth'
- From: "George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr." <tyrebiter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:41:46 -0700
On 11 Sep 2006 07:20:46 -0700, "gonerail@xxxxxxxxx"
<gonerail@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Excuse me,I thought I saw 596 datapoints on that link site. I doubt if
the real truth will ever be known but we can hope.
Where's the part about the bankers?
or the countless other theories of conspirators?
I started looking at the inside job sites, and it only takes a few
minutes to spot gross errors in their reasoning
For instance, the first thing I looked into was - the towers fell at
free fall speeds, so it had to be demolition.
But that was based on seismic information - which does not actually
measure the time of fall. Cameras with time stamps show that instead
of ten seconds, the buildings took 16,20,26 seconds. Hard to be sure,
because of the dust. But it's obviously more than the Party Line that
the fall took ten seconds.
How come after five years the strange theory crowd hasn't corrected
that?
They say that the two towers came down on their footprints. So it had
to be demolition. Well, no. Tower one hand stuff landing in the
street, and some of its debris knocked the hell out of Building 7,
causing a big hole in it twenty stories high.
How come they haven't in five years corrected that claim?
They say fire can't cause the steel girders to fail. Not hot enough.
Yet in one building, Marie Windsor, there were two structural
elements, concrete and steel. The concrete is still there - but you
steel - all collapsed, just from fire.
The stuff about how fire impacts on steel - may be nice in theory, but
one look at the photo of the MarieWindsor shows the theory isn't worth
***.
Yet the "bush-did-it" crowd just keeps plugging along.
Now I picked this stuff up in maybe one hour surfing the web. The
off-the-wall folks have had years to find it. But they havent. They
are not even looking for anything contrary to their views.
Charges planted - would have been ignited in the fires, sporadically.
Were they? The wires to detonate them - would burn up so they could
not have blown out the beams they were attached to.
I'll spend another hour and I'll have more problems with the Black
helicopter types.
But my point is that there is a perfectly reasonable explanation of
what happened.
Contrary to what you read on the web.
Most folks I come
across anymore are self centered ignorant slobs and don't deserve a.
democracy or freedoms and they should be killed anyhow. To bad the
thinking moral few will suffer with the imbecils when the USA is bought
to her knees which won't be long in coming. Bring on the Rapture,I'm
ready !!!!!!!!
- References:
- Why The Media Embraced '911 Truth'
- From: gonerail@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Why The Media Embraced '911 Truth'
- From: George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr.
- Re: Why The Media Embraced '911 Truth'
- From: gonerail@xxxxxxxxx
- Why The Media Embraced '911 Truth'
- Prev by Date: Angelides upstaged - by Villaraigosa and a girl!
- Next by Date: The Deadly Terrorist Numbers Games
- Previous by thread: Re: Why The Media Embraced '911 Truth'
- Next by thread: Brownstein: Elect more red state Dems, blue state GOP
- Index(es):