How Would Scott Erb End WWII?
- From: Chris Morton <cmorton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 16 Nov 2005 14:05:53 -0800
How would Scott Erb end the Pacific War?
How would he defeat the Japanese?
Would he even WANT to?
Whose lives would he value more? The Chinese, Vietnamese, Filippinos, and
Westerners starved, tortured and murdered by the Japanese, or the Japanese
killed to end their war of genocidal aggression?
Why does Scott think that doing NOTHING would magically end the Japanese
slaughter of the innocent? Why didn't doing NOTHING prevent the Rape of
Nanking? Does Scott even believe there WAS a Rape of Nanking?
How many American and British lives does Scott think it was worth to avoid
harming Japanese civilians by bombing, conventional and atomic? Why does he
apparently value their lives over those of the Vietnamese whose rice harvest was
CONFISCATED by the Japanese?
Why would Scott allow Unit 731 to continue its human vivisection experiments?
Why would Scott allow Japan to sit unmolested to perfect the combination of high
altitude balloons and biological weapons?
Whose lives and freedom would Scott be willing to trade away to protect the
Japanese people? What of the Korean comfort women? Does he even believe there
WERE any? Does he view continued enslavement of the Korean people as a price to
be payed for "negotiated settlement"?
These and a multitude of other questions go unanswered. Could it be because
Scott is ashamed of his answers?
--
--
Gun control, the theory that 110lb. women should have to fistfight with 210lb.
rapists.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: CNN's reporters adn anchors sound like their counterparts from the Daily Show. Was this supposed to be the thing that improved ratings?
- Next by Date: Re: 344. Roberts, a secret agent of D.O.J. (9/18/05)
- Previous by thread: CNN's reporters adn anchors sound like their counterparts from the Daily Show. Was this supposed to be the thing that improved ratings?
- Next by thread: Re: 344. Roberts, a secret agent of D.O.J. (9/18/05)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
