Re: California Supreme Court Flunks Biology


J.C. wrote:
> The California Supreme Court ruled yesterday in three cases that the court
> is the final arbitrators of parental rights and that judges, not biology,
> define parents. The cases, all involving lesbian couples, dealt with a
> request for child support by a non-biological partner, a petition to
> establish parental rights for an egg donor, and a ruling that one lesbian
> partner should be listed as the "father" on a child's birth certificate. The
> court actually declared, "We see no reason why both parents of a child
> cannot be women." The fact that it is biologically impossible seems not to
> matter.
>
> Sad indeed!

Hmmm, and if the husband is infertile and the wife is artifically
inseminated, who is recorded as "father" on the birth certificate?


>
>
> --
> J.C.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Ohio Court: Egg Donor Has Parental Rights
    ... Ohio Court: ... Ohio - A woman who sold her eggs has parental rights to the ... birth to the triplets in 2003. ...
    (alt.true-crime)
  • California Supreme Court Flunks Biology
    ... The California Supreme Court ruled yesterday in three cases that the court ... is the final arbitrators of parental rights and that judges, not biology, ... request for child support by a non-biological partner, ...
    (talk.politics.misc)
  • Re: Sperm Donors Should Be Held Liable
    ... The children of single parents have as ... I got her Father to sign over his ... parental rights. ... but he would not be responsible for child support. ...
    (alt.politics)