Re: Why mooslems are animals part 19
- From: "korastinsky@xxxxxxxxx" <korastinsky@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2007 05:04:50 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 24, 8:27 pm, "Stan Engel" <Stan_en...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What I came up with was the example of German males who did not resist as
their wives and daughters were raped. I also mentioned Indian parents who
did not resist as the Canadian government took their kids. I could have
mentioned the Czechs of Lidice who did not resist as their children were
taken from them.
What you came up with, and conveniently snipped in this message, was
"Matter of fact I don't hear about parents who forcibly try to prevent
state agencies from taking possession of their children."
An obvious attempt to compare people who allow their children to be
taken from them with the intent of torturing and murdering them, with
people who
have custody of their children revoked by State agencies, where you
insinuate they
will receive the same fate.
It's a pretty pathetic argument, from a pretty pathetic, although
mentally ill
person.
Now you need to back your claim with proof.
<<In any case Jews did resist but it's difficult to fight
back when only the other side has a gun.>>
Difficult but not impossible.
How would a coward like you know? Maybe you've read some books on the
subject?
Why don't you try and take someones child from them and see for
yourself? Most people will fight to the death to protect their
children.
If you aren't willing to do so, you shouldn't have children in the
first place.
<< The Jews did resist as
the German records show.<<
What German records show is that many were shocked at the total lack
of resistance
among Jews when they came to take them and their families to their
deaths. Including many cases of 4 or 5 Germans taking up to a
thousand prisoners without incident.
Well, I go by true name (Stanley Engel) and so does Jeffrey Krantz. What is
your full name?
There is no more proof that these are your real names than anything
else
you have written, most of which has been exposed as lies.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why mooslems are animals part 19
- From: Stan Engel
- Re: Why mooslems are animals part 19
- References:
- Why mooslems are animals part 19
- From: Jeffrey Krantz
- Re: Why mooslems are animals part 19
- From: Jeffrey Krantz
- Re: Why mooslems are animals part 19
- From: korastinsky@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Why mooslems are animals part 19
- From: Jeffrey Krantz
- Re: Why mooslems are animals part 19
- From: korastinsky@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Why mooslems are animals part 19
- From: TheZ
- Re: Why mooslems are animals part 19
- From: korastinsky@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Why mooslems are animals part 19
- From: Stan Engel
- Re: Why mooslems are animals part 19
- From: korastinsky@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Why mooslems are animals part 19
- From: Stan Engel
- Re: Why mooslems are animals part 19
- From: korastinsky@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Why mooslems are animals part 19
- From: Stan Engel
- Re: Why mooslems are animals part 19
- From: korastinsky@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Why mooslems are animals part 19
- From: Stan Engel
- Re: Why mooslems are animals part 19
- From: korastinsky@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Why mooslems are animals part 19
- From: Stan Engel
- Why mooslems are animals part 19
- Prev by Date: Re: Why can't Jeffrey list any Jewish accomplishments?
- Next by Date: Re: Why mooslems are animals part 19
- Previous by thread: Re: Why mooslems are animals part 19
- Next by thread: Re: Why mooslems are animals part 19
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|