Re: Re: We're Muslims. We can't be blamed.
- From: Topaz <mars1933@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 18:02:50 -0500
On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 19:00:25 -0700, Shlomo <stanleykr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
You know, Topaz. EVERYTHING that has happened to the Arabs has been
caused by the Arabs themselves.
No, it was the Jews.
"After the Second World War, shortly before the United Nations
partition of Palestine into separate Jewish and non-Jewish areas, Jews
still made up less than one-third of the population of Palestine. The
1946 British census counted 608,000 Jews out of a total population of
1,845,000. The great majority of these Jews were recent immigrants,
whereas nearly all of the Arabs were natives who had roots in
Palestine going back many generations. What the Jews had that the
Palestinians didn't have, however, was a very substantial degree of
control of the governments of the United States and the United
Kingdom, and these two countries exerted a decisive influence on the
policies of the United Nations. The result of this influence was the
partition of Palestine in 1948 into separate Jewish and non-Jewish
areas, with the one-third of the population that was Jewish being
awarded two-thirds of the land, including the most valuable areas.
The Jews immediately set about ethnically cleansing their areas,
carrying out a number of horrifying massacres of non-Jewish
Palestinians and terrorizing tens of thousands of others into fleeing
from their homes, which immediately were seized and occupied by the
Jews. In a series of wars since 1948, the Jews, backed by the United
States, seized even more Palestinian land. The Palestinians who were
driven from their land-the real Palestinians, whose parents and
grandparents and great-grandparents had owned the land-were forced
into crowded and dirty refugee camps, where they still live. And
whenever one of these dispossessed Palestinians strikes back at the
Jews who stole his country from him, everyone in the Bush government,
from the chief liar on down, and everyone in the controlled media here
denounces the Palestinian as a "terrorist"-and all of the Sally
Soccermoms and Joe Sixpacks nod in agreement.
I'll tell you about one of these Palestinian "terrorists" you've
certainly heard mentioned by the media if you pay any attention at all
to what's happening in the world. He's called Abu Nidal: the most
feared Palestinian "terrorist" of them all. The name the man called
Abu Nidal was born with is Sabri al-Banna. He was born in 1937 in the
Palestinian coastal city of Jaffa. His family was one of the
wealthiest and most distinguished families in Palestine and owned,
among other things, more than 6,000 acres of orange orchards, which
were the major source of income for the family. When Sabri al-Banna
was an 11-year-old schoolboy, the Jews seized all of his family's
orchards and other lands, all of their houses, and everything else his
family owned, and he and his family ended up living in a tent in a
refugee camp in the Gaza strip. Quite a shock for a quiet,
introverted little boy.
The shock led him to dedicate his life to evening the score, to
gaining justice for his people, to striking back at the Jews who had
stolen all of his family's property and driven them into a refugee
camp. He built what was probably the most highly disciplined and
ruthless fighting organization on the Palestinian side. He struck not
only at Jews but also at Palestinians who collaborated or compromised
with the Jews. Whenever Abu Nidal's troops would strike,
machine-gunning Israeli tourists at an airport or bombing some Jewish
facility in another country, the politicians and the media here always
would go into hysterics about Arab "terrorism." I always cheered. Abu
Nidal is not some crazed murderer who likes to kill people. He is a
Palestinian patriot fighting for his people and for his country in the
only way he can fight under the circumstances. He does not "hate
America's freedom" as George Bush and the media would have you
believe. There is no reason for him to be an enemy of America, except
that we have made him an enemy by arming and financing the Jews who
stole his family's orange groves and forced him into a refugee camp.
Remember that whenever you buy an orange that came into America from
Israel: one of those sweet Jaffa oranges that are so favored by New
York Jews. That orange is stolen property. It belongs to Abu Nidal. It
was stolen from him by the Jew who sold it to you."
As early as 1882, they began waging a War of Genocide against the
Zionists, but they don't seem to realize that waging a war, and
losing, has its consequence.
Oslo 1993 gave the Pallies a chance to build a nation, and many took
the opportunity to do so. But then there were the Arab Idiots who
chose to use the Israeli withdrawal as an excuse to build a Terrorist
Base instead of a nation.
One Man's Terrorist...
"Perception is all - or almost all. Perception can be shaped and
moulded by the conditioning of the mass media, which unkind folk might
prefer to call 'brainwashing'. We, playing follow my leader to the
Americans, are now part of what is termed a 'War against Terror'.
Whilst involved in this war we can afford to send forth large convoys
of vehicles to some desert, at the same time as NHS dentistry crumbles
at home, and water bills rise to extortionate levels. If these trends
continue, maybe we can look forward to seeing an élite of Mandelson
clones in smart suits lording it over grubby, toothless proles!
But this not the first 'War on Terror'. Sixty years ago Germany and
the other Axis powers were convinced that they were fighting a war
The French Resistance were termed terrorists: even RAF Bomber Command
were referred to as the terrorflieger. The Soviet partisans were seen
as terrorists who had slain several hundred thousand German soldiers.
Looming over all this was the perceived Judaic role in Communism which
had almost annihilated the old, predominately Germanic ruling élite in
Russia. According to Alexander Solzhenitsyn, the chief concentration
camp boss supervising this slaughter was Naftaly Frenkel, a Turkish
Indeed the association of certain highly-placed Jews with Communism
wasn't just a perception of the Germans, but a reality noted by many
different commentators. A novel such as John Buchan's Thirty Nine
Steps used that fact as a plot background. Eric Hobsbawm recorded in
one of his histories that the small Egyptian communist party had an
almost wholly Jewish membership. Writing in the 50s, Daily Telegraph
Foreign Correspondent Lovat F. Edwards commented that Communism had
very little appeal to Arabs because they were inclined to equate it
Today the US régime goes to war, and justifies slaughter and
destruction on massive scale by a perceived 'offence', but are their
reasons perhaps less convincing than those of the Germans? I have
written myself on the many anomalies surrounding the September 11th
attacks (see Spearhead No. 423). From the five dancing Israelis
filming the collapsing Twin Towers, to a crashing aircraft at the
Pentagon that leaves no debris or lawn damage, almost nothing makes
sense if we follow the official story. Indeed, the most wacky
conspiracy theory of all now seems to be that it was all planned and
perpetrated by a man with a beard and turban stuck in a fortified
No top Americans killed
Then again, while Germans such as Ernst von Rath and Wilhelm Gustloff
fell to the bullets of 'Jewish extremist' terrorists, no American
politicians or officials have been shot down by 'Islamic extremist'
gunmen from the possibly semi-mythic Al Qaeda. We are also expected to
surrender our ancient liberties in favour of ID cards and iris scans,
when Al Qaeda has caused no injuries or damage in this country
whatever. This is in stark contrast to the IRA or even the Irgun, who
blew up Rex Farran and injured three postmen in Britain during 1946.
Beyond this, there are no connections between Al Qaeda and Iraq, and
never were outside the fevered minds of Perle and Co. In fact,
recommended reading for everyone should be: 'How the US helped to
create a monster' by John Clarke, which appeared a few years ago in
the Irish Examiner.1
Yet this flimsy excuse has been used to wreak a trail of havoc and
destruction. At Fallujah, US forces have bombed hospitals, cut off
water supplies to civilians, and used napalm bombs. Like their Israeli
twins, snipers have targeted not only insurgents, but also old men,
women and children. Seventeen doctors and nurses were even gunned down
as they attempted to cross the Euphrates to aid the wounded. Civilians
have been shot as they attempted to wave white sheets to surrender.
The entire countryside has been poisoned by depleted uranium shells.
Germans were hung or imprisoned after World War II, often for doing
much, much less than has been perpetrated in Iraq over the past year
But the neocon journalist Ralph Peters, writing in the New York Post
took a sanguine view of the Fallujah slaughter, saying that:
'We don't need more complaints about our treatment of prisoners from
the global forces of appeasement. We need terrorists dead in the dust.
And the world needs to see their corpses...
'Even if Fallujah has to go the way of Carthage, reduced to shards,
the price will be worth it. We need to demonstrate our strength of
will to the world, to show that there is only one possible result when
madmen take on America.'
Incidentally, I've read through quite a number of articles in the
German wartime magazine Signal and never managed to find anything
remotely as bloodthirsty as this NYP piece. Has the USA reverted back
to the thinking behind the Book of Joshua and the injunction to
"destroy everything that breathes?"
What's happened in Iraq since the fall of Saddam has been simply
disgusting - more or less the murder of an entire society.
The man responsible
The article 'Apocalypse Now?'2 by Jonathan Mark, published in The
Jewish Week, had some remarkable things to say about the man with
ultimate responsibility for prosecuting the so-called 'War against
Terror'. Although - at times - coming over a lot like an
'anti-Semitic' parody, the essay was worthy of note for revealing the
thinking of some leading lights of the Lubavitch movement. Before
reading the quote, it should be explained that the word 'Ishmael'
symbolises the Arab and Muslim peoples, just as 'Esau' indicates
Christians and Europeans. It goes:
'"We usually think our ultimate enemy is Esau," says Rabbi Butman of
the metaphorical representative of Christianity. "Here, we see it is
Ishmael. Esau - the president and the Christian right - support us and
Ishmael is the culprit we're going to break now."
'Jewish religious conservatives aren't nervous, they're delighted.
Radio talk show host, Dennis Prager, writing for Jewish World Review,
an Orthodox online magazine, says, "To the extent that one is ever
able to see the hand of God in history... I believe that either divine
intervention or good luck on the magnitude of a lottery win explains
George W. Bush's rise to the position of president." Bush is
"remarkable," Rabbi Fund tells The Jewish Week, "the ultimate Shabbos
There you have it: the "ultimate Shabbos Goy" has presided over a
holocaust of some 100,000 Iraqis, plus over 1,000 of his own troops.
Yet, finally it all comes down, as it usually does, to money, power
and (dis)information. The BBC or NBC will never reveal the truth, so
the misinformed and easily deceived can still go on believing in a
nice clean 'War against Terror', against all those evil men who hate
our freedoms blah blah... There could be endless TV documentaries on
the expulsion of the Palestinians, or memorials and museums of the
Iraqi Holocaust, but there are none.
It is also just a matter of perception: the perception of what is a
'War against Terror,' and what is a 'Holocaust.'
3. A Shabbos Goy being, like Bush or Blair, a Gentile politician who
aids Zionist interests."
Look, the Jews RETURNED to our ANCESTRAL HOMELAND
Jews claim to be the people of the Old Testament (the Israelites)
because they have the Jewish religion. This proves nothing. People
change their religion. The Edomites and the Khazars became Jewish but
they are not Israelites by race:
Encyclopedia Americana 1956
"HYRCANUS...John....a Jewish high priest...he next overcame the
Idumaeans and obliged them to submit to Judaism."
"Idumaean" is Greek for Edomite. The Edomites became Jews in 100
BC and are known as Jews today.
And the New Jewish Encyclopedia, edited by David Bridger, PH.D in
association with Samual Wolk, Rabbi, J.S.D, copyright 1962, Published
by Behrman House, inc.,1261 Broadway, New York 1, N.Y., Library of
Congress Catalog Card Number: 62-17079, says on page 266:
"Bulan, the pagan ruler of the Khazars, in his desire to embrace the
'true religion' had summoned representatives of Christian, Moslem, and
Jewish faiths to expound their views on the superiority of their
respective religions. Bulan thus became convinced of the truth of the
Jewish faith, and he, as well as many of his noblemen, embraced
Judaism, which later spread widely among the common people of the
The Edomites and the Khazars became Jews and the real Israelites
changed their religion and became Christians.
Christ said in Mathew 15:24 "I am not sent but unto the lost
sheep of the house of Israel."
He came for the chosen race and sheep are a symbol for the chosen
race, but this is what He said to the Jews:
John 10:26+27 "But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as
I said unto you. My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they
This means the real Israelites converted to Christianity. This
explains why Europe became known as Christendom.
The Israelites were direct descendants of Adam, who was the
first White man. The Hebrew word "adam" describes a White man. We are
not the color white like milk. We are a light skinned race and the
light skin allows blood, the color red to show in the cheeks. This is
the definition of the word "adam" in Strong's Concordance:
"to show blood (in the face), i.e. flush or turn rosy:- be
(dyed, made) red (ruddy)."
This can only be describing a White man. Look at people today
and see which ones have rosy red cheeks. They are light skinned White
people. The Israelites were White.
The Bible says David was ruddy. This is the definition of the
Hebrew word "ruddy":
"reddish (of the hair or of the complexion):-red, ruddy."
David had rosy cheeks (or red hair) and did not look like a
The Bible says the Israelites would be a blessing to the world.
It is the White race that invented all the great things and advanced
civilization on the earth.
The Bible tells us that the Jews are imposters.
Revelation 2:9 "I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews,
and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan."
Many verses tell us that Jews are our enemies. Here is one
John 7:1 "After these things Jesus walked in Galilee; for he would
not walk in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill him."
The Jews have been expelled from every Christian nation in
Europe at one time or another. Many people know that they are enemies
of White civilization. But not everyone knows the reason. It is
because they are not the chosen race and they hate those who really
are the chosen race.
by LEGAL IMMIGRATION"We must expel Arabs and take their places."
and LEGAL LAND PURCHASE. If the Arabs chose not to respect these
FACTS, they did so at their own risk, but it's clear they don't accept
the risk that they themselves chose to take. Furthermore, the
Zionists didn't need Arab permission to establish a nation in an area
where they were almost 65% of the population. The Arabs are simply
paying the price for thinking that the Zionists did.
And then there's the bottom, bottom line. The Arabs were offered
their own nation, AND TURNED IT DOWN!!!!!
David Ben Gurion, 1937, Ben Gurion and the Palestine Arabs, Oxford
University Press, 1985.
"We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation,
and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab
David Ben-Gurion, May 1948, to the General Staff. From Ben-Gurion, A
Biography, by Michael Ben-Zohar, Delacorte, New York 1978.
"There has been Anti-Semitism, the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was
that their fault? They see but one thing: we have come and we have
stolen their country. Why would they accept that?"
Quoted by Nahum Goldmann in Le Paraddoxe Juif (The Jewish Paradox),
"Jewish villages were built in the place of Arab villages. You do not
even know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame you
because geography books no longer exist. Not only do the books not
exist, the Arab villages are not there either. Nahlal arose in the
place of Mahlul; Kibbutz Gvat in the place of Jibta; Kibbutz Sarid in
the place of Huneifis; and Kefar Yehushua in the place of Tal
al-Shuman. There is not a single place built in this country that did
not have a former Arab population."
David Ben Gurion, quoted in The Jewish Paradox, by Nahum Goldmann,
Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1978, p. 99.
"Let us not ignore the truth among ourselves ... politically we are
the aggressors and they defend themselves... The country is theirs,
because they inhabit it, whereas we want to come here and settle down,
and in their view we want to take away from them their country."
David Ben Gurion, quoted on pp 91-2 of Chomsky's Fateful Triangle,
which appears in Simha Flapan's "Zionism and the Palestinians pp 141-2
citing a 1938 speech.
David Ben Gurion
Prime Minister of Israel
1949 - 1954,
1955 - 1963
"[The Palestinians] are beasts walking on two legs."
Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin, speech to the Knesset, quoted
in Amnon Kapeliouk, "Begin and the 'Beasts,"' New Statesman, June 25,
Prime Minister of Israel
1977 - 1983
Yitzhak Shamir, Maariv, 02/21/1997.
"(The Palestinians) would be crushed like grasshoppers ... heads
smashed against the boulders and walls."
Isreali Prime Minister (at the time) Yitzhak Shamir in a speech to
Jewish settlers New York Times April 1, 1988
Prime Minister of Israel
1983 - 1984,
1986 - 1992
"It is the duty of Israeli leaders to explain to public opinion,
clearly and courageously, a certain number of facts that are forgotten
with time. The first of these is that there is no Zionism,
colonialization, or Jewish State without the eviction of the Arabs and
the expropriation of their lands."
Ariel Sharon, Israeli Foreign Minister, addressing a meeting of
militants from the extreme right-wing Tsomet Party, Agence France
Presse, November 15, 1998.
"Everybody has to move, run and grab as many (Palestinian) hilltops as
they can to enlarge the (Jewish) settlements because everything we
take now will stay ours...Everything we don't grab will go to them."
Ariel Sharon, Israeli Foreign Minister, addressing a meeting of the
Tsomet Party, Agence France Presse, Nov. 15, 1998.
"Israel may have the right to put others on trial, but certainly no
one has the right to put the Jewish people and the State of Israel on
Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, 25 March, 2001 quoted in BBC
- Re: We're Muslims. We can't be blamed.
- From: Shlomo
- Re: We're Muslims. We can't be blamed.
- Prev by Date: Re: We're Muslims. We can't be blamed.
- Next by Date: Re: Re: We're Muslims. We can't be blamed.
- Previous by thread: Re: Re: We're Muslims. We can't be blamed.
- Next by thread: Re: We're Muslims. We can't be blamed.