Re: Isalm and the Holocaust

howard_aubrey wrote:
> docremington wrote:
> > howard_aubrey wrote:
> > > docremington wrote:
> > > > howard_aubrey wrote:
> > > > > docremington wrote:
> > > > > > howard_aubrey wrote:
> > > > > > > docremington wrote:
> > > > > > > > howard_aubrey wrote:
> > > > > > > > > James wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > We must never forget that on Sept.12, 2001, Israel's flags were flying at
> > > > > > > > > > half-staff and the Palestinians were dancing in the streets.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Tell us James. What do you think about these fine individuals
> > > > > > > > > celebrating and having a good time on 9/11?
> > > > > > > > > http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/fiveisraelis.html
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Rather a dumbarse page, full of the protocols of the learned flying
> > > > > > > > saucers.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Then you should have *no* problem dispelling this highly published, in
> > > > > > > major media sources, article with some facts, right?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yeah, right, and 4000 jews did not show up for work too, I know, I
> > > > > > know. Those major media sources, as the NYT proves it, may be major
> > > > > > dumbarse, what else is new, epsecially when the conduit himself does
> > > > > > not care about what he's talking about, right?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'll be waiting 'doc' : )
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I recommend going to bed, giving the protocols of the learned area 51 a
> > > > > > rest.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > In other words, you've got nothing except a big mouth as usual, eh
> > > > > 'doc'?
> > > > > Your parents must be so disappointed.
> > > >
> > > > Baseless allegations, bordering on lying, is the best
> > > > self-assassination my tifosi opponenets can offer, maintaining that the
> > > > big mouth stuff, kiddie insults are their reserve, resort and retreat.
> > > >
> > > > > Cough up an article to refute the ones I posted, or FOAD, OK?
> > > >
> > > > Very much civilized, isn't it? Anyway, we can wait until one of us (and
> > > > it is not me) coughs up how "legal borders of the generous UN Partition
> > > > Plan" can be legal and how israeli wars are "are nothing but
> > > > propaganda". Bth, 4000 jews didn't show up for work, did they? So, why
> > > > don't we admit that we indulge in closet freemasonrywatch, and evil
> > > > jooz did it? It will be fair.
> > > >
> > > > > Like I said, I'll be waiting : )
> > > >
> > > > I recommend going to bed, giving the protocols of the learned area 51 a
> > > > rest.
> > > >
> > > > > cheers...
> > > >
> > > > Cheers!
> > >
> > > Ahh, repeating yourself, and avoiding the subject at hand.
> > >
> >
> >
> > Forget it, my opponents always use that and blame it on me, especially
> > if there is no subject.
> >
> > > I'll take
> > > that as yet another victory over the pathetic twat known as 'doc'.
> >
> > So, how "legal borders of the generous UN Partition Plan" can be legal
> > and how israeli wars "are nothing but propaganda" to substantiate this
> > rather junior-high "pathetic twat" blah-blah victory claim? How about
> > becoming a man, eh?
> > The rest we can safely delete.
>
> STILL avoiding the subject at hand, eh 'doc'?
>


A made-up conspiracy drivel? Nothing new.

> What a surprise : )

Not to me.

> You disputed a published and cited article. Do you have something to
> back up your claim or not?

Does this conspiracy drivel has any backing? It doesn't.

> Maybe it's time you stopped using mommy and daddy's computer for a
> while. I'm starting to feel embarrassed for you, LOL!

How about dispensing with these rather childish attempts at insults?
Since they don't annoy me, it may be beneficial to switch that brain
activity to something productive, and feign, if not actually produce, a
manly behavior.

> I'll be waiting for those references, OK?

No problem, that dog don't hunt anyway. We have all the time in the
world, don't we? For the time being, a nice comment from Skeptic:
"A little bit of selectively plagiarized quotes from people, who
actually know what they're talking about, to give an impression of
plausibility, a few easily-debunked urban legends, which will never
stop circulating, to provide a sublty prejudicial flavor, a dash of the
argument from ignorance, and you can throw in a completely unsupported
assertion as a conclusion, and the odds are that nobody will notice
either the plagiarism, the use of editing to change the tenor of the
lifted material, the complete lack of direct support for the
conclusion, nor the fact that it rests on one of the
conspiracy-monger's favorite informal logical fallacies." Throw in
judeophobes and sensationalists and the pic is complete.

> cheers...

Cheers!

.