Re: Too Much Medicare "Care" Again
- From: "Skeptic" <bcs002b@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 01:16:30 GMT
"George Conklin" <georgeconklin1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:JXWPh.17349$PL.8113@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Skeptic" <bcs002b@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:WCQPh.23612$_c5.10404@xxxxxxxxxxxx
the
"George Conklin" <georgeconklin1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ftQPh.18588$tD2.11531@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Only after a committee decided what the men might have died of, where
yourdifferent classification of several would have negated the results.
So, like I said, YOU are cherry picking which studies to use to support
opinion.
No I am not. I am using your study. It shows a high degree of
subjectivity, not scientific objectivity. At best, the so-called results
are also marginal. And that is the problem. Even using the best evidence
you can find, the results are marginal and the larger studies are not yet
out. Why? Billions for billing for treatments and nothing to speak of
for
evaluation. After all, you also say you KNOW the truth so why do real
research?
Even when PIVOT and the others come out, if they don't show what you want,
you will reject them...
kind of like you're rejecting the European study? Lol, ok hypocrite.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Too Much Medicare "Care" Again
- From: George Conklin
- Re: Too Much Medicare "Care" Again
- References:
- Re: Too Much Medicare "Care" Again
- From: George Conklin
- Re: Too Much Medicare "Care" Again
- From: Skeptic
- Re: Too Much Medicare "Care" Again
- From: George Conklin
- Re: Too Much Medicare "Care" Again
- From: Skeptic
- Re: Too Much Medicare "Care" Again
- From: George Conklin
- Re: Too Much Medicare "Care" Again
- Prev by Date: Re: Too Much Medicare "Care" Again
- Next by Date: Re: Too Much Medicare "Care" Again
- Previous by thread: Re: Too Much Medicare "Care" Again
- Next by thread: Re: Too Much Medicare "Care" Again
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|