Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- From: "Skeptic" <bcs002b@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 00:39:41 GMT
"George Conklin" <georgeconklin1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:giJPf.1895$x94.1515@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Skeptic" <bcs002b@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:MmFPf.603053$084.36659@xxxxxxxxxxxx
cheaper
"George Conklin" <georgeconklin1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:PqAPf.1758$x94.73@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Skeptic" <bcs002b@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:QrmPf.806634$x96.445883@xxxxxxxxxxxx
"George Conklin" <georgeconklin1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:jMkPf.2637$Bj7.2320@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Skeptic" <bcs002b@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:qGiPf.10071$oL.9060@xxxxxxxxxxxx
"George Conklin" <georgeconklin1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:2iePf.2580$Bj7.1764@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bulk purchasing does not function in a labor-intensive industry.
It
is
just an excuse to hose the uninsured.
That staement is pure denial.
It is a FAct. In a production assembley, the more you do, the
theyit
patientsgets. In a labor-intensive industry like hospitals, you add more
you add more costs.
So you think it would be cost effective to open and run an entire
hospital
for a single patient? Volume matters you fool.
Correct they matter. More volume = more cost in a labor-intensive
industry like medicine. Insurance companies get to pay less because
lesscan move a block of people at one time. That does not mean it costs
andto
service each individual patient. Are you going to accept less pay the
more
patients you see? I thought not.
Ok - you ask someone of your friends who has a clue about cost structure
see if an entire hospital could survive with a patient base of 1. Don'tYou are playing the idiot by suggesting a hospital with 1 patient. It
play the idiot.
shows your intelligence, ie 1.
It's called "exaggeration to make a point". I'm surprised a man of your
intelligence (ie, more than 1, whatever that means) hasn't heard of it. Let
make it easier for a smart man like yourself to understand.
An entire hospital, with an ER, an OR, hospital beds, specialists, etc etc
etc which were dedicated to a single patient would not survive. Increase
that patient base to 20 patients, and it stil doesn't survive. Going to the
other extreme, if it had 10's of thousands of patients there would be enough
patients to justify its services. Now, that means that somewhere in between
there are enough patients to start paying for the hospital. That is called
volume. What volume would of course depend on what services are offered,
how many employess, etc. But the bottom line is that volume matters.
Even an unintelligent person like myself knows that, George.
.
- References:
- Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- From: George Conklin
- Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- From: Skeptic
- Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- From: BumKnee
- Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- From: Herman Rubin
- Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- From: Skeptic
- Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- From: George Conklin
- Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- From: Skeptic
- Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- From: George Conklin
- Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- From: Skeptic
- Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- From: George Conklin
- Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- From: Skeptic
- Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- From: George Conklin
- Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- From: Skeptic
- Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- From: George Conklin
- Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- Prev by Date: Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- Next by Date: Kevin Trudeau's infamous chapter 6, common sense to good health, PT I
- Previous by thread: Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- Next by thread: Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|