Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- From: "George Conklin" <georgeconklin1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 22:56:12 GMT
"Skeptic" <bcs002b@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:MmFPf.603053$084.36659@xxxxxxxxxxxx
cheaper
"George Conklin" <georgeconklin1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:PqAPf.1758$x94.73@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Skeptic" <bcs002b@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:QrmPf.806634$x96.445883@xxxxxxxxxxxx
"George Conklin" <georgeconklin1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:jMkPf.2637$Bj7.2320@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Skeptic" <bcs002b@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:qGiPf.10071$oL.9060@xxxxxxxxxxxx
"George Conklin" <georgeconklin1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:2iePf.2580$Bj7.1764@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bulk purchasing does not function in a labor-intensive industry.
It
is
just an excuse to hose the uninsured.
That staement is pure denial.
It is a FAct. In a production assembley, the more you do, the
theyit
patientsgets. In a labor-intensive industry like hospitals, you add more
you add more costs.
So you think it would be cost effective to open and run an entire
hospital
for a single patient? Volume matters you fool.
Correct they matter. More volume = more cost in a labor-intensive
industry like medicine. Insurance companies get to pay less because
lesscan move a block of people at one time. That does not mean it costs
andto
service each individual patient. Are you going to accept less pay the
more
patients you see? I thought not.
Ok - you ask someone of your friends who has a clue about cost structure
see if an entire hospital could survive with a patient base of 1. Don't
play the idiot.
You are playing the idiot by suggesting a hospital with 1 patient. It
shows your intelligence, ie 1.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- From: Skeptic
- Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- References:
- Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- From: George Conklin
- Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- From: Skeptic
- Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- From: BumKnee
- Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- From: Herman Rubin
- Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- From: Skeptic
- Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- From: George Conklin
- Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- From: Skeptic
- Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- From: George Conklin
- Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- From: Skeptic
- Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- From: George Conklin
- Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- From: Skeptic
- Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- From: George Conklin
- Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- From: Skeptic
- Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- Prev by Date: Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- Next by Date: Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- Previous by thread: Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- Next by thread: Re: Hospitals Hose Uninsured: For Herman
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|