Re: Antibiotic Rights


"~Rita" <deuman04@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:fYCdnTISd_YJJ5beRVn-rA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Skeptic" <bcs002b@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:jVyMe.34109$084.9705@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> "~Rita" <deuman04@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:DuudnRVgxueTKZ_eRVn-rg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> >> Streptomycin wasn't a cancer drug in 1994, is it now?
>>
>> Uneducated one. It is not, was not, and never will be. It is an
>> antibiotic. It kills certain kinds of bacteria. It is not chemotherapy.
>>
>> > I feel that the United States of America has a flawed Tuberculosis
> testing method,
>>
>> Interesting coming from a woman who, a few posts ago, stated that you
> didn't think TB testing was done in the US any longer.
>>
>> > so if the people living in the USA had a Tuberculosis test, a
>> > million tests would be positive. Once the large amount of TB infection
> is noticed, it would probably be blamed on the terrorists.
>>
>> TB is not easily passed in a terrorist type fashion. There are many
>> other
>> much better options. We have a pretty good idea about the number of TB
>> infections - I think the CDC still keeps that information public if
> you're
>> interested. The amount of TB in this country is quite small, especially
>> when compared to other countries.
>>
>> You continue to post on topics you know little - if anything - about.
> Why?
>
> I would like the right to my choice of antibiotics, and my choice of
> medical treatment.

> What part is unclear?

The part where you explained how such a system could be done safely. Oh,
wait, you didn't ... because you can't. You don't understand the difference
between drugs used for bacterial infections vs viral infections vs cancer.
If you had free choice of medications, Rita, you'd have killed yourself
and/or your husband and who knows who else a very long time ago.


.

Relevant Pages