Christo-Libertarianism
- From: Stephen Stink <not4udude@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 11:55:42 -0700 (PDT)
8/13/2011
Is Christo-Libertarianism a contradiction?
First: The definition. Christo hyphenated with Libertarianism.
Religious belief combined with the economics of Laissez Faire
Capitalism. Emanates from Calvinist Prosperity Gospel.
Now you know the definition of this bizarre political hybrid of the
Christian right. Let’s examine the many contradictions. As you know,
libertarians are advocates of prostitution, gambling, abortion, Gay
Marriage and the legalization of drugs. Fundamentalist Christians? Not
so much! One contradiction that Christo-Libertarians advocate is the
notion that the government has no right to regulated corporations.
However, when it comes to sex, the government has the right to control
the way you express your sexuality if it’s against the precepts of the
Bible. In other words, the government has a right to be in your
bedroom.
The truth is: Libertarianism is closer to the Church of Satan than
the Church of Jesus Christ. Satanists believe in irrationality of
selfishness. If someone gets in your way, you have every right to kill
that someone. Ayn Rand’s philosophy of Objectivism believed in
rationale selfishness, which meant if someone gets in your way, walk
around him or her then sue him or her. An Individual is the center of
the universe. Nowhere in the King James Bible expresses that
sentiment. Matter of fact: Ayn Rand was a fervent atheist.
She was adamant believer in Godless Capitalism. She detested American
conservatives because of their stand supporting Christian morality.
She didn’t like the Libertarian Party that much. She denounced them in
1973. If she were alive today, she would also denounce the Tea Party
movement.
Since her death in the 80’s, the conservative movement has been very
selective of Ayn Rand’s philosophy. They loved her economic believe
system, however they gloss over her ideas of the right of hedonism.
The religious right has renounced the self-esteem movement for
individual happiness. It emanated from her philosophy, if it feels
good? Then do it!
The American right has extracted Ayn Rand free market concept and
made it their concept. They are cafeteria propagandists, they take
only what suits them. Not only Ayn Rand was opposed the welfare state,
She didn’t believe in government subsidies for corporations neither,
in other words, welfare for the rich.
It is safe to assume that Tea Baggers and Christo-Libertarians are
politically stupid. They are just puppets of racist plutocrats. Now
let’s get something straight, they are not Anarchists! Tea Baggers are
not opposed to Government. They are opposed to left wing government.
They support government, their type of government. Which is a mouth
full…they support a theocratic racist plutocratic republic. Which
means, poor people die in the streets with their Christian religion to
keep them warm at night. If they want, they could join the military to
protect the Koch Brothers foreign oil wells. The welfare state was
never to be a permanent program. It’s a temporary situation. If there
weren’t capitalist negligence, there wouldn’t be a need for a welfare
state.
One more thing, so-called Liberals and progressive do not want to
take away your right to own a business and make money. They are
opposed to exploitation, thievery, and low wages. The only people who
want to take away your right to make money is the authoritarian left
and the religion right no matter what the denomination is.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Christo-Libertarianism
- From: Michael Price
- Re: Christo-Libertarianism
- Next by Date: Re: Drug Test the Politicians?
- Next by thread: Re: Christo-Libertarianism
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|