Statistical study: Democrats are healthier than Republicans

So an example of the flaws in your "CCW holders are "higher quality"
than the general population.

I want to do a study of the general health of people of the two
leading political ideologies. So I take a sample of each with polls,
I select at random 1000 Republicans, and 1000 Democrats. The
Republicans, I screen for and document all health issues. I create
lists and percentages of all illnesses, genetic, mental, contagious,
everything I can find and determine what proportion of the population
of Republicans experience what medical problems. Now, I take my
population of Democrats, and strictly screen them medically, but
unlike my Republican group I throw out all Democratic samples that do
not pass my screening medical exam and do not count them. So after
eliminating most if not all of my Democrats that exhibit any sort of
medical problems, THEN I run them through the same medical screening
I do the Republicans and document, and identify the same percentages
of the same diseases. So now I compare the two without any regard
whatsoever for my initital screening and elimination of sick
Democrats. Guess what? I've just "proven" Democrats are much
healthier than Republicans. Republicans are just a bunch of sick,
"lower quality" people than Democrats.

So, any of you right wing idiots see a problem with my study? What
about yours that claims CCW holders are "higher quality" than the
general population? Anything mein Herren?
.

Relevant Pages