Re: The People of Columbus, OH Fight To Enact Sensible Gun Laws
- From: The Lone Weasel <loneweasel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:29:13 -0700 (PDT)
On Sep 30, 3:40 pm, Jim Yanik <jya...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bert Hyman <b...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote innews:Xns9E0390204C023VeebleFetzer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Innews:Xns9E0380299E7B7NRACLAPTRAPBORGGUN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<NRACLAPT...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
They didn't use "person" or "persons" in the Second Amendment, which
is the term they would have used if they meant an individual "person".
You're saying that the 1st and 4th Amendments don't apply to
individuals?
SCOTUS has already ruled on the meaning of "the People".
And it's not in favor of the "collective" nonsense.
Actually, Rehnquist ruled that "the people" is always used in the
collective context.
Which is wrong. You have to know the real-life context of the terms
used.
I count 49 instances of the term "person" or "persons" in the
Constitution, but just 9 instances of "people".
And "people" never appears with the definite article. The framers
wrote "The People" and they meant "The People." And "The People"
ratified the the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, even though just
a few people actually voted on it.
I know you people will never figure that out, eh Mr. Yankit?
Next.
--
NRACLAPTRAP
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The People of Columbus, OH Fight To Enact Sensible Gun Laws
- From: The Lone Weasel
- Re: The People of Columbus, OH Fight To Enact Sensible Gun Laws
- Prev by Date: Re: The People of Columbus, OH Fight To Enact Sensible Gun Laws
- Next by Date: Re: The People of Columbus, OH Fight To Enact Sensible Gun Laws
- Previous by thread: Re: The People of Columbus, OH Fight To Enact Sensible Gun Laws
- Next by thread: Re: The People of Columbus, OH Fight To Enact Sensible Gun Laws
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|