Re: Barbara Boxer: Living in a Blue Dream World
- From: Jim Yanik <jyanik@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 17:25:30 -0500
"Wayne" <mygarbagecan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:i6j7ej$k80$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
september.org:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfreude@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:a8gp861l66b3gjjskf2iudgqemegjgtbrh@xxxxxxxxxx
"Boxer countered that ["assault weapons"] bans have kept people safe.-
"To go back to that dangerous yesterday makes no sense at all," she
said. "It has bipartisan support."
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/sep/02/local/la-me-senate-20100902/4
Here's hoping you try pulling off your new "assault weapons ban"
BEFORE November......
Ma'am.
She obviously has been watching too many movies that involve "assault
weapons".
she and most anti-gun folks would not be able to tell the difference
between an "assault weapon" and an assault rifle.
To them,ALL firearms are "assault weapons".
--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
localnet
dot com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Barbara Boxer: Living in a Blue Dream World
- From: JohnJohnsn
- Re: Barbara Boxer: Living in a Blue Dream World
- References:
- Barbara Boxer: Living in a Blue Dream World
- From: Klaus Schadenfreude
- Re: Barbara Boxer: Living in a Blue Dream World
- From: Wayne
- Barbara Boxer: Living in a Blue Dream World
- Prev by Date: Re: EDITORIAL: Criminals Already Have Guns-- You Don't Need One- Dig a Moat Instead
- Next by Date: Re: Barbara Boxer: Living in a Blue Dream World
- Previous by thread: Re: Barbara Boxer: Living in a Blue Dream World
- Next by thread: Re: Barbara Boxer: Living in a Blue Dream World
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|