Re: Barbara Boxer: Living in a Blue Dream World

On Sep 12, 5:25 pm, Jim Yanik <jya...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Wayne" <mygarbage...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:i6j7ej$k80$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfre...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:a8gp861l66b3gjjskf2iudgqemegjgtbrh@xxxxxxxxxx

"Boxer countered that ["assault weapons"] bans have kept people safe.
"To go back to that dangerous yesterday makes no sense at all," she
said. "It has bipartisan support."
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/sep/02/local/la-me-senate-20100902/4

Here's hoping you try pulling off your new "assault weapons ban"
BEFORE November......

Ma'am.
-
She obviously has been watching too many movies that involve
"assault weapons".

she and most anti-gun folks would not be able to tell the
difference between an "assault weapon" and an assault rifle.
To them,ALL firearms are "assault weapons".

It's intentional:

"Assault weapons—just like armor-piercing bullets, machine guns, and
plastic firearms—are a new topic. The weapons' menacing looks, coupled
with the public's confusion over fully automatic machine guns versus
semi-automatic assault weapons—anything that looks like a machine gun
is assumed to be a machine gun—can only increase the chance of public
support for restrictions on these weapons. In addition, few people can
envision a practical use for these weapons."
--Josh Sugarmann, Assault Weapons and Accessories in America, 1988

Boxer, just like our very own Lyin' Loser Weasel, reads straight out
of the Violence Policy Center/Handgun Control Inc./Brady Campaign To
Ban Guns From The REAL Militia of The United States Constitution
Propagandist Handbook.
.

Relevant Pages