John Lott - Peer review "almost certainly more so than any other paper in the field"
- From: "betweentheeyes" <betweentheeyes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 22:12:20 -0400
For those nay-sayers
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/648703/posts
..One of the normal standards for quality is peer review. Lott's research has
certainly received that; almost certainly more so than any other paper in
the field. Although some researchers don't release their actual research
data, and a few explicitly refuse to do so (including at least a few of
those whose research tends to drive pro gun-control public policy), John
Lott seems to have promptly released the actual data behind his published
research to academic researchers at 42 different universities. In terms of
the scope of their studies, Lott and Mustard examined data from all 3,054
counties in the United States, from 1977 to 1994.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: John Lott - Peer review "almost certainly more so than any other paper in the field"
- From: Klaus Schadenfreude
- Re: John Lott - Peer review "almost certainly more so than any other paper in the field"
- Prev by Date: Re: John Lott - Peer review "almost certainly more so than any other paper in the field"
- Next by Date: Washington Times Chimes In With Accurate Assessment of Calderon Whining
- Previous by thread: Chrysler adds 1,100 jobs at Detroit Jeep plant
- Next by thread: Re: John Lott - Peer review "almost certainly more so than any other paper in the field"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|