Re: If this isn't the defintion of Socialist/Communist...

Matt <matttelles@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:25888873-f5da-4b7f-8da0-a24dbd655c92@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

On Apr 29, 7:06 pm, Peter Franks <n...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Lookout wrote:
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 16:18:50 -0500,
grey_ghost471-newsgro...@xxxxxxxxx (Gray Ghost) wrote:

I don't know what is.

PRESIDENT OBAMA: "Now, what we?re doing, I want to be clear, we?re
not trying
to push financial reform because we begrudge success that's fairly
ear
ned. I
mean, I do think at a certain point you've made enough money."

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/04/28/obama_to_wall_stre
e..
.
ink_at_a_certain_point_youve_made_enough_money.html

This man is a sick joke and a danger to liberty. Period. I hope to
liv
e long
enough to piss on his grave.

No, this is NOT the definition.

Not literally, to be sure, but figuratively -- definitely!

Who or what has any business deciding for another when someone has
made enough money?

Translation: "I got mine, screw you."

So, tell me Peter, you advocate monopolies? Because that is what you
just
said. Now, are you a COMMUNIST that doesn't believe in an absolute
free market
economy?

If Obama were serious about placing a max on personal income, he should
start looking at his friends in Hollywood or sports figures.


--
Sleep well tonight,

RD (The Sandman)

Future historians will be able to study at the Gerald Ford
library, the Jimmy Carter library, the Ronald Reagan library,
both George Bush libraries and the Bill Clinton adult bookstore.
.