Re: Utah Governor Signs Law Charging Women and Girls With Murder for Miscarriages

On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:02:37 -0500, ozarkheart@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:55:29 -0500, Lookout <mrLookout@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:39:41 -0500, ozarkheart@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 03:55:07 -0500, Lookout <mrLookout@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:27:11 -0500, ozarkheart@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:25:25 -0500, Lookout <mrLookout@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:47:05 -0500, ozarkheart@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 08:52:00 -0500, Lookout <mrLookout@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:17:31 -0600, ozarkheart@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 04:43:28 -0600, Lookout <mrLookout@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:10:41 -0600, ozarkheart@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:17:08 -0600, Lookout <mrLookout@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:24:37 -0600, ozarkheart@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:04:37 -0600, Lookout <mrLookout@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:16:09 -0500, "Scout"
<me4guns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hosea Prieto wrote:
Lookout wrote:
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:14:36 -0800, Hosea Prieto
<undisclosed@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Lookout wrote:
http://www.truthout.org/utah-governor-signs-law-charging-women-and-girls-with-murder-miscarriages57526

Conservatives want to get in your personal business more than any
liberal does.
This bill protects the rights and life of the unborn which is a
noble and courageous action.

At the expense to the freedoms of the woman? Bullshit.
It's NONE OF YOUR DAMN business.

No, not at the expense of anyone's freedoms. There isn't the right to
terminate life, especially precious and innocent life such as a fetus.

Really? So tell me, am I free to use your body against your will?

Of course not

Is anyone?

What principle makes it different for the fetus?

A fetus isn't PERSON. It's part of the woman's body. That's why it's
called a FETUS.

It is called a fetus by some; others call it un unborn child.

Medically and legally it's a fetus. THAT'S what it is. Period.

Indeed; and a fetus is one of the stages of development of a person.

Uhh..is a cow fetus a stage of development of a person?

No, dimbulb; it is a stage of development for a cow.


Besides..it's a STAGE OF DEVELPMENT. Not a person with rights.

Problem there is who makes the definition and what one believes.


And you keep denying the fact that if you give a fetus rights you are
taking away the rights of a woman.

Happens all the time in many areas.

Site?


A woman cannot drive as fast as she wants; her right to drive as fast
as sghe wants is taken away.

That's a public safety issue.

Indeed, it is a safety issue. Now carry it a step further.....


Shall i continue?

Sure, if you want to look stupid again.



Do you have two arms?

Yes. And a stupid question.

Only because you can't see where it leads.

Are you free to do what you want to do with tose two arms?

No, of course not.

Bingo. Now you are cathcing on.

You got no where. Again,

well, it is not my fault your are thick as a brick.

Shall I explain further? Or will it give you a headache?

You didn't explain anything the first time.

Well, I confess I depended on you to be able to think ahead a bit. My
bad.

They are your arms, but you cannot do "anything you want" with them.

See where I am headed yet? (70/30 says you don't).

My arms aren't a woman's fetus.

Cutting off my arms would NOT be murder or a crime.

Try to keep it on topic.
.

Relevant Pages