Re: Calif. Senate approves single-payer health care

On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 15:50:33 -0500, WangoTango
<Asgard24@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <a4cem5djttlptgmd22v4lv3rfu5se1b4cp@xxxxxxx>,
mrLookout@xxxxxxxxx says...
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:32:22 -0800, Bill Smith <quandary@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:10:11 -0600, Lookout <mrLookout@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100128/ap_on_re_us/us_california_health_care;_ylt=Atp_9L9DLGtS1gYnPq8bg0Ks0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTN0cXU1b2NoBGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMTAwMTI4L3VzX2NhbGlmb3JuaWFfaGVhbHRoX2NhcmUEY2NvZGUDbW9zdHBvcHVsYXIEY3BvcwM5BHBvcwM2BHB0A2hvbWVfY29rZQRzZWMDeW5faGVhZGxpbmVfbGlzdARzbGsDY2FsaWZzZW5hdGVh

The tide is turning.

This is largely the bill that the Governator vetoed once before. It
seems he insisted that there should be some way to pay for it, there
was no provision in the bill for that, still isn't.

The tide is turning to what, exactly?

Bill Smith
Nation wide Universal health care. The OMB says it will eventually be
cheaper than what we do now.

And, what makes you think that?

The OMB says it will save between 600 and 750 BILLION dollars over the
next 10 years. Prove otherwise

I will make you a wager.

I don't gamble.
.

Relevant Pages