Re: "Gun control: If not after the deaths of six officers, when?"
- From: Phil Smythe <smytph@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:55:49 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 25, 3:49 am, "DockScience" <DockScie...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Phil Smythe" <smy...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:56144296-66f7-4912-b08a-644d5995370d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Gun control: If not after the deaths of six officers, when?
Maybe if gun control worked, there could be a debate here.
But it doesn't.
Not anywhere.
This is why so many pro-gunners are held in very low esteem, they
think they can simply say a thing and it immediately becomes a
reality. You, like the rest, are deluded by ideology and impervious to
facts.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Gun control: If not after the deaths of six officers, when?"
- From: ozarkheart
- Re: "Gun control: If not after the deaths of six officers, when?"
- References:
- "Gun control: If not after the deaths of six officers, when?"
- From: Phil Smythe
- Re: "Gun control: If not after the deaths of six officers, when?"
- From: DockScience
- "Gun control: If not after the deaths of six officers, when?"
- Prev by Date: Re: "Gun control: If not after the deaths of six officers, when?"
- Next by Date: Re: More guns equals less tyranny?
- Previous by thread: Re: "Gun control: If not after the deaths of six officers, when?"
- Next by thread: Re: "Gun control: If not after the deaths of six officers, when?"
- Index(es):
