Re: "Gun control: If not after the deaths of six officers, when?"
- From: Phil Smythe <smytph@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:18:04 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 24, 10:38 am, jigo <reti...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Phil Smythe wrote:
Gun control: If not after the deaths of six officers, when?
THE OLYMPIAN | • Published January 22, 2010
Enough.
Neither gun manufacturers’ profits and quasi-interpreted Second
Amendment rights, nor the convenience of packing heat are valid
reasons to endanger innocent lives any longer.
Six police officers were shot and killed within two months in Puget
Sound. A young man was shot over an iPod and two teenagers were shot
in Burien at an apartment complex.
...
Come on. You know that anecdotal evidence like that is logically
fallacious.
So, according to you, "Six police officers were shot and killed within
two months in Puget Sound. A young man was shot over an iPod and two
teenagers were shot in Burien at an apartment complex". is logically
fallacious?
Have you told the friends and relatives of those shot this? And if you
have, what was their reaction?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: "Gun control: If not after the deaths of six officers, when?"
- Next by Date: Re: "Gun control: If not after the deaths of six officers, when?"
- Previous by thread: Re: "Gun control: If not after the deaths of six officers, when?"
- Next by thread: Re: "Gun control: If not after the deaths of six officers, when?"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
