Re: "Gun control: If not after the deaths of six officers, when?"
- From: "editor@xxxxxxxxxxx" <editor@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 18:14:06 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 23, 7:41 pm, Phil Smythe <smy...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Neither gun manufacturers’ profits and quasi-interpreted Second
Amendment rights, nor the convenience of packing heat are valid
reasons to endanger innocent lives any longer.
"Quasi-interpreted?" Don't you commies realize that the U.S. SUPREME
COURT just interpreted the Second Amendment as meaning exactly the
individual's right to own a handgun - in the Heller case?
http://www.Internet-Gun-Show.com - your source for hard-to-find stuff!
.
- References:
- "Gun control: If not after the deaths of six officers, when?"
- From: Phil Smythe
- "Gun control: If not after the deaths of six officers, when?"
- Prev by Date: Re: "Gun control: If not after the deaths of six officers, when?"
- Next by Date: Re: "Gun control: If not after the deaths of six officers, when?"
- Previous by thread: Re: "Gun control: If not after the deaths of six officers, when?"
- Next by thread: Re: "Gun control: If not after the deaths of six officers, when?"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
