Re: More guns equals less tyranny?
- From: tankfixer <paul.carrier@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:17:59 -0800
In article <27488076-4f4d-40dd-87e2-74fafca83135
@b9g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, smytph@xxxxxxxxxxx says...
On Jan 23, 10:18 am, tankfixer <paul.carr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <a1998fc2-361d-484a-9ea1-0da5a4586c74
@j14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, groverse...@xxxxxxxxx says...
This a political question. Let me first make very clear that it's a
theoretical question. I'm a gun owning Republican & I completely
support second amendment rights for all. So here's the question - How
can people say that widespread gun ownership keeps the government
respectful of citizens and their liberties - when in Saddam's Iraq,
apparently most if not all homes contained full auto AKs? Widespread
gun ownership existed alongside the most rigid tyranny.
Ready? Discuss.
-3.8 on the troll scale
Marking yourself Tankfixer?
Nope..
Would you like your grade now ?
I can assure you that your mommy won't be pleased with it..
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: More guns equals less tyranny?
- From: Phil Smythe
- Re: More guns equals less tyranny?
- References:
- More guns equals less tyranny?
- From: NKC Anglican
- Re: More guns equals less tyranny?
- From: tankfixer
- Re: More guns equals less tyranny?
- From: Phil Smythe
- More guns equals less tyranny?
- Prev by Date: "Gun control: If not after the deaths of six officers, when?"
- Next by Date: Re: More guns equals less tyranny?
- Previous by thread: Re: More guns equals less tyranny?
- Next by thread: Re: More guns equals less tyranny?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
