Re: felons?
- From: "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net>
- Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 14:52:19 -0500
"tsar" <tsar@xxxxxxx> wrote in news:h67234$68j$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfreude@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:781e85pgjfl5m4698mifcvgj1vh21fdnh9@xxxxxxxxxx
In talk.politics.guns "tsar" <tsar@xxxxxxx> wrote:
"RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9C6874C604070hopewell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"tsar" <tsar@xxxxxxx> wrote in news:h66qg6$rvc$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
How many people think felons should be allowed to legal possess
guns?
That depends on whether the felon was convicted of a violent or a
non violent crime. A person convicted of a violent crime has
already shown a
propensity to use violence to achieve an end. He/she probably
should not
have that right restored.
So you oppose the Second Amendment?
Do you oppose the 4th Amendment?
No. So will you now answer my question as forthrightly as I?
Yes, we do not oppose the Second Amendment.
--
Sleep well tonight,
RD (The Sandman)
"The widest gap between liberals and conservatives is the blank
space between the First and Second Amendments to the US Constitution."
Peter McWilliams, author, "Ain't Nobody's Business If You Do".
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: felons?
- From: tsar
- Re: felons?
- From: Klaus Schadenfreude
- Re: felons?
- References:
- felons?
- From: tsar
- Re: felons?
- From: RD (The Sandman)
- Re: felons?
- From: tsar
- Re: felons?
- From: Klaus Schadenfreude
- Re: felons?
- From: tsar
- felons?
- Prev by Date: Re: felons?
- Next by Date: Re: felons?
- Previous by thread: Re: felons?
- Next by thread: Re: felons?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
