Re: Gun owners Demand Government obey the Law, See DC v Heller, Pp. 54-56.

Let the Record show that Zombywoof <Zomby-Woof@xxxxxxx> on or about
Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:01:59 -0400 did write/type or cause to appear in
talk.politics.guns the following:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 20:05:13 -0500, "HeyBub" <heybub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Demon Buddha wrote:

Did you think you'd get unlimited gun rights or something?

What part of "shall not be infringed" confers power of limitation on
the government?

All "rights" have limits. In fact, for every "right" a person has, there is
a similar "duty" on the part of someone else.

There is a required course in law school called "Conflict of Laws" and
governs how to reconcile two laws where on mandates an action that is
prohibited by another. It ain't easy to figure all this stuff out.

That is because there are to many lawyers constantly generating more &
more laws. Oh the last one didn't work because the criminals ignored?
Well golly gee, let's whip up a new & improved law (without taking the
old one off the books first).

It's called "fixing the problem caused by the previous fix". Or
"the solution to housing prices being too high is not to remove the
restrictions on new construction, but to mandate that new construction
cost less."
Or to be on topic "Too many people being robbed? Prohibit the
concealed carry of firearms." Still too many people being robbed? Ban
open carry! Still too many? Ban possession! It is interesting that
the quantity "Too many" keeps increasing, while the method chosen for
solving the problem has no effect.


toodles
pyotr

-
pyotr filipivich
"Quemadmoeum gladuis neminem occidit, occidentis telum est. "
Lucius Annaeus Seneca, circa 45 AD
(A sword is never a killer, it is a tool in the killer's hands.)
.

Relevant Pages