Re: Note to Phil
- From: "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:01:10 -0500
swamp <swampmunge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:gbpdr4pjt5tpj5pdgn62l79ufl2kfb7t4a@xxxxxxx:
If the police are being overwhelmed by armed public, then perhaps
they'll need to be armed too.
The police are constantly complaining about being undergunned when
facing gang members or drug dealers. They are part of the armed
public.....illegally armed but still part of the public.
Illegally armed?
The drug dealers and gang members not the police. But then you knew
that.
[Had to leave this in. SweePea will live]
No, you need to be clear.
I was clear.
No, you weren't. You stated "the police.. are illegally armed." I can
help with your English if you'd like. ;)
It is right up above, mon ami. See where I said and I quote:
"The police are constantly complaining about being undergunned when
facing gang members or drug dealers. They are part of the armed
public.....illegally armed but still part of the public."
That last sentence points to the gang members or drug dealers. I thought
you were smart enough to figure that the police probably are not
"illegally armed". I was wrong, you aren't smart enough.
--
Sleep well tonight.........RD (The Sandman)
If you can read this......thank a teacher and your school system.
If it is in English.......thank a vet and the Border Patrol.
.
- References:
- Re: Note to Phil
- From: swamp
- Re: Note to Phil
- From: RD (The Sandman)
- Re: Note to Phil
- From: swamp
- Re: Note to Phil
- From: RD (The Sandman)
- Re: Note to Phil
- From: swamp
- Re: Note to Phil
- Prev by Date: Re: More Cop's Guns Stolen
- Next by Date: Re: Note to Phil
- Previous by thread: Re: Note to Phil
- Next by thread: Re: Note to Phil
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|