Re: Want To Shut Obama Up?

Dr. Jon-Pierre Pigglesworth <greetmir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:7n6tc4diejk1v6cppa8qujmos7b0qm8spi@xxxxxxx:

On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 12:02:57 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
<rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote:

Dr. Jon-Pierre Pigglesworth <greetmir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:k0mqc4l8q5ioohggrm2450n72b0ftroc32@xxxxxxx:

On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 11:30:24 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
<rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote:

Dr. Jon-Pierre Pigglesworth <greetmir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:oa0pc45grr4rt1jah6emfv0uqda3irb6l8@xxxxxxx:

On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 21:55:21 -0500, grey_ghost471-
newsgroups@xxxxxxxxx
(Gray Ghost) wrote:

John-Pierre Pigglesworth <greetmir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:f35oc4phki962vq6gmonio93rg7pvjurfh@xxxxxxx:

On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 13:27:37 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
<rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote:

John-Pierre Pigglesworth <greetmir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:egvnc4lv30dansc0l95402rmivb2vrdaju@xxxxxxx:

On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 12:03:33 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
<rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote:

Illinois Boy <illinoisboy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:HPGdnfyfL7kDolbVnZ2dnUVZ_tzinZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:

Felix D. wrote:

"Bill Smith" <quandary@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:o3mlc495lrnah8e21mv5aejdn2sggh423v@xxxxxxxxxx

On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:51:16 -0700, John-Pierre Pigglesworth
<jpierre@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On 12 Sep 2008 15:11:01 -0500, "Fred Brown"
<fredbrown@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


"Mr. Albritton" <albritton77@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:gacejb$666$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Turn off his tele-prompter and take away his flash
cards.

Why would you want to? I think the Democrats right to
free
speech with any and all technologies available should be
protected at all costs.

Bill Smith

If the 1st Amendment can be defended so damn well, the
2nd
should be defended with the same diligence and energy.

Or are we going to amend the first 10 amendments?


I do believe that is on Obama's 'things to do list'.
According to the democrats the Constitution & BOR are
archaic
and should be re-written.


they are and they should.

Please give us an example of what you would like BOR to be.



I'd leave it like it is except for one small change. I'd
edit
the Second read: "The right of the people to keep and bear
arms
shall not be infringed." Written this way, there's no
"handle"
for the cranks to seize on and use to try to destroy RKBA.

But even without that edit, I'd keep the BOR as it is. It's
not
the re-write I'm afraid of, it's who might be doing the
re-writing.


If B. Hussein Obama is elected, It will be rewritten by B.
Hussein Obama, George Soros and Rebecca Peters of Australia,
citizens of the world. If they allow Americans to have any
guns
at all, they want to limit it to single shot rifles that will
not shoot more than 100 yards.


No, it would have to be rewritten by constitutional convention
or
two- thirds of both houses AND ratified by three fourths of the
states or their legislatures. Obama and company simply cannot
rewrite it.


You don't know what he can do.

It was written once, it can be re-written.

Not without an amendment following the process above. He can
ignore
it like Bush has done with some of it but he can't rewrite it.

I didn't say how, I just said it can be re-written and needs to
be.






Sop,it can be rewritten outside of the outlined methods, which
would
make the changes invalid, but you would approve of that as long as
the
things you thought were important were given priority.

Are you mentally, physically and emotionally prepared for the fact
that large numbers of people might take umbrage to that fact and
become irritated. Or is that why GUNZ should be limited to 100 yard
range so when you cower in your ivory tower you think you'll be out
of
range?


Don't make things so scientific. Somethings things just are what
they
are. A gun that shoots 100 yards seem very adequate unless you're
law enforcement or military. So what's the problem?

Not when hunting antelope at 300 yards.

Guess I'll get another tirade instead of a simple answer.

You got a simple answer. If it isn't simple enough, I can try using
smaller words.


How often do you hunt antelope?

From time to time.....

and for what?

Food or trophy. If it is trophy I give the meat to soup kitchens.



Trophy? You kill an animal for trophy?

Pretty sick.

Oh, well......the poor get lots to eat from it.



--
Sleep well tonight.........RD (The Sandman)

http://home.comcast.net/~rdsandman


"Be who you are and say what you feel...Because those that
matter...don't mind...And those that mind...don't matter."
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Want To Shut Obama Up?
    ... According to the democrats the Constitution & BOR are ... and company simply cannot rewrite it. ... A gun that shoots 100 yards seem very adequate unless ... Some people hunt in order to put meat on the table. ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: Want To Shut Obama Up?
    ... According to the democrats the Constitution & BOR are ... It's not the re-write I'm afraid of, ... company simply cannot rewrite it. ... If it is trophy I give the meat to soup kitchens. ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: Want To Shut Obama Up?
    ... According to the democrats the Constitution & BOR are archaic ... the re-write I'm afraid of, it's who might be doing the ... not shoot more than 100 yards. ... it like Bush has done with some of it but he can't rewrite it. ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: Want To Shut Obama Up?
    ... not the re-write I'm afraid of, it's who might be doing the ... ignore it like Bush has done with some of it but he can't rewrite ... A gun that shoots 100 yards seem very adequate unless ... If it is trophy I give the meat to soup kitchens. ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: Want To Shut Obama Up?
    ... cannot rewrite it. ... Not when hunting antelope at 300 yards. ... If it is trophy I give the meat to soup kitchens. ...
    (talk.politics.guns)