Re: #DC Mayor Tries To Keep Handguns Banned
- From: "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:19:10 -0500
Kipster <kipster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:tkld74t8a2u7b4q2h8fg3lqn05k64m8dif@xxxxxxx:
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 22:43:06 -0400, Miguel A. González
<miguel.gonzalez@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:48:28 -0400, "Topp@Work"
<topprolmc@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Registration was tried in California too. Guess what. When the
"KipH" <k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:6o2b74p13tep5g3mg16gtbc5vuvrt295if@xxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 22:20:17 -0500, "SaPeIsMa"news:kiv9745hhb3pbg6k3lca4g7502fsaelv09@
<SaPeIsMa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in
message news:Xns9AD69209CA58DSandman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
KipH <k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
between4ax.com:
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 13:22:29 -0400, "Brian Carey"
<careyb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"4114 Dead" <zeppp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:avq974lnma4mshtri7aecoaqsnlpo3ch2o@xxxxxxxxxx
But that's not the point. The point is that the holding
does not distinguish between revolvers and semis.
I didn't say it did. But local communities can distinguish
aboutthe two.
And just where did the ruling say that?
When it says that communities may licence and register
handguns,
It does not say "communities may licence and register
handguns."
You really should read this decision.
Implicit is the fact that the communities can decide on a set
of criterium for that.
Yeah. Maybe they can only register guns without triggers.
LOL!
guns will be registered so just deal
Some will.....most won't.
Just look at how successful the Canadian Gun Registry was
Less than 50% of the estimated guns were registered at a cost
of
evenC$2 Billion
DO you even imagine that a gun registry in the US has half a
chance of
getting that "successful " ?
And how much do you think it will cost to even try ?
How does Canada figure into this? I notice the gun thugs always
involve another country when it's convenient, otherwise, they want
nothing to do with them and America becomes the Almighty.
They tried what you propose...
It is an example (proof) of the thing you propose, that it will just
waste money and time....or in otherwords be a dismal failure...
But, like a retard, you bury your head in the sand .,...
commies in the State legislature decided that certain guns were evil,
they confiscated them.
mostly assault weapons. and so what? they're not needed or necessary
except in warfare.
You don't even know what an assault "weapon" is or you wouldn't have made
a fool out of yourself posting your comment.
--
Sleep well tonight.........RD (The Sandman)
http://home.comcast.net/~rdsandman
Never complain about old age......many others never had that opportunity.
.
- References:
- Re: #DC Mayor Tries To Keep Handguns Banned
- From: RD (The Sandman)
- Re: #DC Mayor Tries To Keep Handguns Banned
- From: SaPeIsMa
- Re: #DC Mayor Tries To Keep Handguns Banned
- From: Topp@Work
- Re: #DC Mayor Tries To Keep Handguns Banned
- From: Miguel A. González
- Re: #DC Mayor Tries To Keep Handguns Banned
- Prev by Date: Re: Licensing and Registration....NEVER!!!
- Next by Date: Re: #DC Mayor Tries To Keep Handguns Banned
- Previous by thread: Re: #DC Mayor Tries To Keep Handguns Banned
- Next by thread: Re: #DC Mayor Tries To Keep Handguns Banned
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading